Time to admit it

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43681
    • 4,650
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #11
    Originally posted by SweetPbfAli
    It's not as a derogatory as some would like to think. It was the name of the slave overseer. They called him cracker because of the sound the whip made when he used it to whip the backs of the ****** in the fields.

    I wish people would stop using it as some sort of slur.
    so its kind of a compliment in a sense. saying you own everyone else and you are the boss

    Comment

    • g27region
      IKSAB
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2016
      • 2483
      • 124
      • 172
      • 23,753

      #12
      Hahahah the guy said Lomachenko was a slave owner

      Comment

      • King_
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2012
        • 8053
        • 329
        • 385
        • 18,528

        #13
        Originally posted by SweetPbfAli
        It's not as a derogatory as some would like to think. It was the name of the slave overseer. They called him cracker because of the sound the whip made when he used it to whip the backs of the ****** in the fields.

        I wish people would stop using it as some sort of slur.
        Ukrainians were never involved in slavery so id say that's pretty derogatory towards Lomachenko.........

        Comment

        • SweetPbfAli
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2006
          • 3291
          • 794
          • 798
          • 28,865

          #14
          Originally posted by g27region
          So he says that Lomachenko's ancestors were slave owners in America? Hahahahaha
          I have no idea. Honestly, most people don't know the origin of the word, just that it is used in an insulting manner. If I didn't read so damn much, I wouldn't know either lol.

          Either way, Loma is incredible irregardless of skin color.

          Comment

          • King_
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2012
            • 8053
            • 329
            • 385
            • 18,528

            #15
            Originally posted by g27region
            So he says that Lomachenko's ancestors were slave owners in America? Hahahahaha
            He's trolling bro.

            Comment

            • g27region
              IKSAB
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2016
              • 2483
              • 124
              • 172
              • 23,753

              #16
              Originally posted by King_
              Ukrainians were never involved in slavery so id say that's pretty derogatory towards Lomachenko.........
              They weren't. Just like the rest of Eastern Europe

              Comment

              • Aztekkas
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2010
                • 5112
                • 373
                • 377
                • 28,221

                #17
                Originally posted by g27region
                Hahahah the guy said Lomachenko was a slave owner
                Massa Lomachenko doe

                Comment

                • SweetPbfAli
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 3291
                  • 794
                  • 798
                  • 28,865

                  #18
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  so its kind of a compliment in a sense. saying you own everyone else and you are the boss
                  The thing is that the overseers didn't own anything. They were basically police before police. A buffer between the wealthy whites and the slave class. They gave the overseer's power in order to give them someone to look down upon and have authority over while ignoring their own shortcomings on socio-economic level.

                  Comment

                  • siablo14
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 39613
                    • 2,646
                    • 12,572
                    • 2,257,607

                    #19
                    Originally posted by SweetPbfAli
                    The thing is that the overseers didn't own anything. They were basically police before police. A buffer between the wealthy whites and the slave class. They gave the overseer's power in order to give them someone to look down upon and have authority over while ignoring their own shortcomings on socio-economic level.
                    They could also have as much Black p*ssy as they wanted and some of them sho' did.

                    Comment

                    • g27region
                      IKSAB
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2016
                      • 2483
                      • 124
                      • 172
                      • 23,753

                      #20
                      Originally posted by King_
                      He's trolling bro.
                      He probably is, I just don't want to see some sucker calling my people "slave owners". I'd be Okay with it if it was true but it never was. You don't like when somebody try to make things up about your people

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP