[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/*****.gif[/IMG]
They robbed Jacobs and you pv$$y's know it
Collapse
-
-
so much ''damage'' and only an off balance kd to show for it. was there even another stumble ?
tell me, how much damage did pacs face show after his last fight with jmm ?Comment
-
****** logic.
we saw with our own eyes Pac got KOed.
We saw with our own eyes in this fight Jacobs got knocked down and Jacobs sustained the most visible damage. both eyes closed. cheeks swollen. Jacobs getting bambi legged by an uppercut in the late rounds.
GGG didn't get KD or KO or any visible damage. he is logically the better defensive fighter. we know Jacobs can crack too. so he just didn't land.Comment
-
YOU brought up facial damage.****** logic.
we saw with our own eyes Pac got KOed.
We saw with our own eyes in this fight Jacobs got knocked down and Jacobs sustained the most visible damage. both eyes closed. cheeks swollen. Jacobs getting bambi legged by an uppercut in the late rounds.
GGG didn't get KD or KO or any visible damage. he is logically the better defensive fighter. we know Jacobs can crack too. so he just didn't land.
i offered an example that i didnt get an answer to.
cheap kd = close win. not much else to discuss.Comment
-
that example was illogical you moron. if Jacobs scored the KD on GGG, then you'd have a case of the fight being equal. like Marquez was losing the fight then he KOed Pacquiao. equalizer.
but not the same here is it? GGG scored the visible damage and the KD you moron.
just kill yourself.Comment
-

that example was illogical you moron. if Jacobs scored the KD on GGG, then you'd have a case of the fight being equal.
Jacobs sustained more visual damage but he scored a KD on GGG to equalize it.
No GGG scored the visible damage and the KD you moron.
just kill yourself.
look at the cu/nt getting all spoiled over someone having a different pov than her
i asked for a pic of pacs face after that nitenite fight and all i got was hurt feelings
!!!!!
close fight
cheap kd
bfd those lumps
deal with itComment
-
Comment
-
Comment


Comment