Was David Avanesyan proven? He was WBA "regular" champion. Has Adrien Broner "proven" himself @ 147? He once held a title @ 147. Has Amir Khan "proven" himself @ 147? He did beat Devon Alexander and Luis Collazo. What say you?
If your saying your not proven until you prove yourself then I agree. The bottom line is we have some idea of how Brook handles himself in a competitive fight with an unbeaten dangerous fighter . we don't know that about Spence yet. We know Brook can take some punishment. We don't know that about Spence yet. So again, don't get the relevance of what Brook had done by the same stage Brooks at, because it's not a tangible as relates to this fight. We know Brook as a fighter better atm , because he's been tested.
I knew when I seen the press conference that Kell and his team are kind of slow. These idiots kept brining up the GGG fight like they won and are way to proud of the tko loss. They also keep bringing up the Porter fight like if that win was decisive as well.
Trainer is a jackass. So if Brook fought a prime Mike Tyson and lasted 4 rounds, it's not a big deal???? Brook's showing against GGG was very impressive. The bigger power eventually won out...as expected. Why didn't the ever so great Floyd fight bigger guys? Elementary. You will lose!
Horrible logic. Comparing GGG to Tyson? LMFAO!! Brook wouldn't last 30 seconds in that fight.
Trainer is a jackass. So if Brook fought a prime Mike Tyson and lasted 4 rounds, it's not a big deal???? Brook's showing against GGG was very impressive. The bigger power eventually won out...as expected. Why didn't the ever so great Floyd fight bigger guys? Elementary. You will lose!
I can't recall to many times, when Mayweather actually outweighed, his opponent.
Actually that one fight was more entertaining and worth more then the other 36 ws.. sometimes a fighter makes his bones in a loss.. same with Vitali K and the Lewis fight. Is was better then all their Ws and Ls combined
If your saying your not proven until you prove yourself then I agree. The bottom line is we have some idea of how Brook handles himself in a competitive fight with an unbeaten dangerous fighter . we don't know that about Spence yet. We know Brook can take some punishment. We don't know that about Spence yet. So again, don't get the relevance of what Brook had done by the same stage Brooks at, because it's not a tangible as relates to this fight. We know Brook as a fighter better atm , because he's been tested.
I feel that Brook has as much to prove as Errol Spence Jr., if not more! Why? Because he hasn't been fighting championship level WWs while he's been the IBF WW Champion for the past 3 years! If this young lion comes to the UK, and stops him, he's finished! Also, I think Brook's constant pursuit of Khan, makes him look even worse. Brook pursued Khan more than Pacquiao, Bradley, Thurman, Garcia, and Spence Jr. That's not a good look!
I feel that Brook has as much to prove as Errol Spence Jr., if not more! Why? Because he hasn't been fighting championship level WWs while he's been the IBF WW Champion for the past 3 years! If this young lion comes to the UK, and stops him, he's finished! Also, I think Brook's constant pursuit of Khan, makes him look even worse. Brook pursued Khan more than Pacquiao, Bradley, Thurman, Garcia, and Spence Jr. That's not a good look!
Brook knows how much money him and Khan make in a UK fight, or at least Eddie Hearn does. Low risk high reward. I think Brook should be commended for defying Hearn who wanted him to go up a division to fight someone soft for a vacant title. And while it's true that his mandatories have been soft he's got a hard one now and hadn't shirked it, as many thought he would. I gotta admit I'm really looking forward to this one. So many unknowns. The kind of match up that we used to see much more of.
Put Ernie Smith vs Chris Algieri on the under card and we can settle this once and for all lol.I got Chris by late stoppage, who knows it could be FOTY lol
Comment