Comments Thread For: Spence's Trainer: Brook Dwells on His Loss as Career High Point!

[Nomadic]

Are you a Brit???

What gave it away?

[Kigali]

What gave it away?

hahahaha

Dude might be American as apple pie.

You never know....US fighters get more hate from their so-called Countrymen than from foreigners.

[Nomadic]

hahahaha

Dude might be American as apple pie.

You never know....US fighters get more hate from their so-called Countrymen than from foreigners.

True. That be the case at times.

[oneofficial]

It was his pro debut, and if you are going to speak, speak the truth....Buckley's record is 31-189-10. Not defending the record, it's still terrible...but there is too much misinformation thrown around on this site.

Kell Brooks fantastic professional resume contains Peter buckley who's resume stats are ;
32-256-12

[filup79]

It was his pro debut, and if you are going to speak, speak the truth....Buckley's record is 31-189-10. Not defending the record, it's still terrible...but there is too much misinformation thrown around on this site.

Yeah and Brook fought a guy named Ernie Smith 3 times in his first 10 fights. First time he fought him, his 7th fight, his record was 11-80-3. His 3rd fight with Smith, 10th pro fight. his record was 13-97-5. Brook had a trilogy with a guy who finished his career at 13-145-5

[FLY TY]

It was his pro debut, and if you are going to speak, speak the truth....Buckley's record is 31-189-10. Not defending the record, it's still terrible...but there is too much misinformation thrown around on this site.

Truth is, if you add kelly's opponent's records throughout his career, it's a losing one, and it's not even close.

He's been a pro for 13 damn years, and his biggest win was over 2 years ago. His most notable fight, which was last year, was a fight he got stopped in the 5th round.

So let me get this straight: Errol Spence gets hated on, and he's taking on a top 3 fighter at his weight who also happens to be a champion, and he's doing it in only his 4th year...meanwhile, it took kell brook 10 1/2 years into a 13 year career to accomplish that same feat...and another 2 years after that to fight someone else noteworthy.

But Spence is overhyped?

Brooks has just as much to prove in this fight as Errol does, because what he's selling, I'm not buying.

[EL_GRINGO]

It was his pro debut, and if you are going to speak, speak the truth....Buckley's record is 31-189-10. Not defending the record, it's still terrible...but there is too much misinformation thrown around on this site.

Those were his stats when he fought Kell Brook yes,i didn't think it would be that important sings that's also pretty pathetic,doesn't make it better

[filup79]

Brook's resume is filled with Euro bums. Been a pro for 13 years and has 1 credible win. Well 2 if you count the great Mathew Hatton. Brook and his team shouldn't be comparing resumes at 21 fights. Cause Brook fought a grueling trilogy against the great Ernie Smith, who was 11-80-3 the first time they fought and finished his career with a record of 13-145-5. Brits called this guy great and elite for fighting bums and have the nerve to call Wilder a bum killer.

[bluepete]

Brook will be Errol's first champion, but Brook still hasn't proved much for a guy that's been fighting for 13 years!

August 18, 2014:

Brook won a majority decision over Shawn Porter on Saturday night, claiming Porter's IBF 147-pound title...

Brook won 117-111 and 116-112 on two American judges' cards, while English judge Dave Parris scored it a 114-114 draw. The Associated Press saw it 115-113 for Brook...

But the star was Brook, who had been waiting nearly two years for his shot at the IBF belt. Three bouts against former champion Devon Alexander fell through before he received the mandatory title shot at Porter, who beat Alexander last year.

http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/i...erweight-title

Brook won, but nothing "Special."

This is a strange line of thought. What difference does it make how long it took for Brook to fight a higher level guy. It's not a comparison of who did what at what stage. It's a comparison of who is proven as of now, in relation to this fight.

[bluepete]

Brook's resume is filled with Euro bums. Been a pro for 13 years and has 1 credible win. Well 2 if you count the great Mathew Hatton. Brook and his team shouldn't be comparing resumes at 21 fights. Cause Brook fought a grueling trilogy against the great Ernie Smith, who was 11-80-3 the first time they fought and finished his career with a record of 13-145-5. Brits called this guy great and elite for fighting bums and have the nerve to call Wilder a bum killer.

Who calls Brook great? He's elite in the sense that he beat a good, at the time quite hyped, fighter away from home to win his title. A fighter that still gave another top champion,Thurman, a very competitive fight. The fact is that Porter is still a better win than any of Deontays wins. Wilder says he's the man at heavy. He's gotta do something better than look bad at a modest level.