True - it is definitely a very fickle sport if you're not an established PPV star (even then shyte can get dicey).
But aye - Bradley vs Thurman/Garcia/Porter; hell, even Guerrero would be a fun fight I'd tune in with excitement.
I hate how the politics of boxing work, where if you're aligned with a certain promoter/network/manager, it automatically inhibits your options as a fighter.
I think realistically, the best fight for Bradley right now is Cotto @ 153ish. I would actually pick Bradley to win that fight - I think his foot speed/dexterity would give Cotto FITS, as Cotto would be getting turned all night, and unable to plant his feet consistently enough in each round to unleash that left hook.
I do think Bradley will give into boo'ing in the crowd and go toe to toe, line for line, blow for blow with Cotto in the mid-rounds, and get dropped once with a wicked left hook.
Bradly SD Cotto: 115-112(Cotto); 114-113; 116-111.
But aye - Bradley vs Thurman/Garcia/Porter; hell, even Guerrero would be a fun fight I'd tune in with excitement.
I hate how the politics of boxing work, where if you're aligned with a certain promoter/network/manager, it automatically inhibits your options as a fighter.
I think realistically, the best fight for Bradley right now is Cotto @ 153ish. I would actually pick Bradley to win that fight - I think his foot speed/dexterity would give Cotto FITS, as Cotto would be getting turned all night, and unable to plant his feet consistently enough in each round to unleash that left hook.
I do think Bradley will give into boo'ing in the crowd and go toe to toe, line for line, blow for blow with Cotto in the mid-rounds, and get dropped once with a wicked left hook.
Bradly SD Cotto: 115-112(Cotto); 114-113; 116-111.
Comment