Bigdunny1 dresses like a woman and tries to suck his dad off when he's drunk
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin Still Pound-For-Pound Number One, Says Lomachenko
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Yerlan T. View PostDon't be silly. Check the facts before posting. Only Kovalev among them is a Russian. Loma is a Ukrainian and Golovkin is a Kazakh.
Comment
-
Originally posted by peplz View PostOh my goodness. Now we're splitting hairs. Ukranian, Kazakh aka Russian. Individuals from Russian speaking countries that were part of the former Soviet Union.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeLorean View Postwhat happened to all that pro American bias from judges mofos were talking about after Ward/Kovalev? oh now the judges had it right huh. fuggin hypocrites.
GGG at 35 years old finally steps up the level of opposition and barely scratches out a win. top ten yes. #1 pfp? not at all. this "win" just lost him the $15 million offer by cinnamon because his stock decreased.
Canelo wanted to beat the boogeyman. now he must face the guy that owes Jacobs a rematch.
Comment
-
Most of the people who say Jacobs won didn't watch the fight or a replay
Originally posted by Johnny_Roa View Postafter getting his ass handed to him that horribly,, lmaoOriginally posted by niceyboo3 View PostI had Jacobs winning but I can see a draw
GGG did far more damage, landed far more shots and far more rounds 9-2. Jacobs had moments, but I've 12 rounds they were less than Brooks.
GGG showed better defenses. Nullified all Jacobs power. Knocked him down and kept hurting him.
And he did this while having every physical handicap one can have and fighting in America with American judges.
When the fight was over, Jacobs wore glasses to post fight interview. He knew showing his face who be telling. All week we heard Jacobs had power and could hurt GGG, yet he did not do much marking him up.
Simple reason for that, he landed on gloves and glancing blows.
The judges didn't get it right, watching the replay shows they gave Jacobs too much credit.
Comment
-
Here's how Boxong Scene Slick lovers see Weight
1. Floyd v Canelo: great win, Canelo was 15-20 pounds heavier.
2. GGG v Brook: GGG too big, too strong.
3. GGG v anyone; his best wins are smaller guys.
4. GGG v Jacobs: so what Jacobs said the extra weight was used as an advantage. Weight means nothing.
Imagine if GGG fought the smaller prime Sergio, missed the second day weigh in, refused fight night weigh in, came in 15 pounds or more heavier and lost.
All we would hear is ggg got beat by a smaller lighter fighter even with massive weight advantage.
When GGG TKO's Canelo, if Ginger really ever fights him, all these guys will say is Canelo was too small" You can cue that up already, it's been one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View PostIt's clear GGG won, and won quite comfortably. These guys think no way a power puncher out boxes the boxer.
GGG did far more damage, landed far more shots and far more rounds 9-2. Jacobs had moments, but I've 12 rounds they were less than Brooks.
GGG showed better defenses. Nullified all Jacobs power. Knocked him down and kept hurting him.
And he did this while having every physical handicap one can have and fighting in America with American judges.
When the fight was over, Jacobs wore glasses to post fight interview. He knew showing his face who be telling. All week we heard Jacobs had power and could hurt GGG, yet he did not do much marking him up.
Simple reason for that, he landed on gloves and glancing blows.
The judges didn't get it right, watching the replay shows they gave Jacobs too much credit.
But did you see the moment where GGG got really hurt in the fight?
It was a right to the body which made him really stop throwing a lot of punches and starting losing a lot of rounds because of it.
No he didn't wont quite comfortably, and it's the worse he's looked in his career.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NYG View PostOnly a ****** calls Rigo the best fighter on the planet. ******
why ?
oh btw, I don't think you would know a good fighter if he punched you in the face
explain who you think is the best P4P, and why?
then explain how the fk Golovkin should be ranked higher than rigo?
then answer the same question and explain how Golovkin should be ranked higher than loma?
i suggest you study the latin phrase ceteris paribus before you reply
clueless g-tard
Comment
Comment