Carl Froch was right

[Motorcity Cobra]

So what's cooning?

Your quest for knowledge is at your fingertips. It's called THE GOOGLES

[Motorcity Cobra]

Jesus Christ man, every single one your posts are about GGG

You're obsessed...and what's cooning?

I don't like ward you don't see me making multiple posts hating him and talking about him in every reply, ggg haters are INFATUATED they can't get over him it's really sad.

Any topic I write that you percieve to be negative about GGG ya'll come running to complain. But I never see ya'll in topics that I write about him like this

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=740501

or this

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=740501

[DeLorean]

still think GGG beats Froch. but the way his fanboys are cryng about a 10 lbs weight advantage for Jacobs I don't think they really want GGG to fight at 168. those guys would outweigh him by more.

[TheCell8]

When was the last time Jacobs was outboxed in a fight, prior to the Golovkin fight?

He's been KOed in a competitive with Pirog, but that's more about a perfect shot landing.

How many times has Froch been outboxed? Against Kessler, against Ward, against Dirrell, Jermain Taylor and against George Groves.

If you lose to Kessler by decision, who is one of the most robotic fighters in boxing history, then you can't objectively say you're a good boxer.

Froch was an OK boxer at best with punching power that helped bail him out of some bad situations. Danny Jacobs doesn't have maybe the chin that Froch has, but he's superior in all other areas.

[Motorcity Cobra]

When was the last time Jacobs was outboxed in a fight, prior to the Golovkin fight?

He's been KOed in a competitive with Pirog, but that's more about a perfect shot landing.

How many times has Froch been outboxed? Against Kessler, against Ward, against Dirrell, Jermain Taylor and against George Groves.

If you lose to Kessler by decision, who is one of the most robotic fighters in boxing history, then you can't objectively say you're a good boxer.

Froch was an OK boxer at best with punching power that helped bail him out of some bad situations. Danny Jacobs doesn't have maybe the chin that Froch has, but he's superior in all other areas.

Look at the names you mentioned. Then look at the names Jacobs fought.

[TheCell8]

Look at the names you mentioned. Then look at the names Jacobs fought.

Kessler: Robot
Dirrell: Underachiever
Jermain Taylor: lol
Groves: hairline
Ward: I'll give you that one

Jacobs destroyed Peter Quillin, who was undefeated a huge power puncher, in one round. He also knocked out Sergio Mora and beat him more decisively than any other fighter that has faced him. Mora has faced a lot of greats.

The point is that prior to facing Golovkin, he had never been out boxed or lost a decision before. The Pirog fight was competitive until he got clipped.

Froch got outboxed by Kessler ffs. Dirrell embarrassed him too, Taylor knocked him down and was in complete control, Groves knocked him down, Ward beat him with one arm. These are not qualities of a great boxer.

[Motorcity Cobra]

Kessler: Robot
Dirrell: Underachiever
Jermain Taylor: lol
Groves: hairline
Ward: I'll give you that one

Jacobs destroyed Peter Quillin, who was undefeated a huge power puncher, in one round. He also knocked out Sergio Mora and beat him more decisively than any other fighter that has faced him. Mora has faced a lot of greats.

The point is that prior to facing Golovkin, he had never been out boxed or lost a decision before. The Pirog fight was competitive until he got clipped.

Froch got outboxed by Kessler ffs. Dirrell embarrassed him too, Taylor knocked him down and was in complete control, Groves knocked him down, Ward beat him with one arm. These are not qualities of a great boxer.

Quillin also fought to a draw with Lee who was beat by Chavez Jr and Saunders. Give me more names on Jacobs resume. Names that are better than Taylor, Kessler, Dirrell.

[KeyboardWarrior]

Froch doesn't have the speed that Jacobs does.

[boliodogs]

It doesn't prove anything. You prove things in the ring not by a bunch of talk. GGG never made any complaints about Jacobs's weight and he won the fight. Jacobs is Jacobs and Froch is Froch and they are completely different fighters. Froch gets no credit for what Jacobs did. What success Jacobs had with GGG was due to hand speed and boxing skills, not being big and strong. It's boxing, not weight lifting or body building. Froch almost lost to washed up Taylor and Andre Dirrell. He isn't that powerful and he isn't that scary. He is a good fighter but nobody that GGG needs to fear or ever did fear.

[Chuckguy]

All this talk about Jacobs weight just proves Froch was right about being too big and to strong for GGG.

Too big & too strong for GGG... pic.twitter.com/WIfhNImCIk

— Carl Froch MBE (@Carl_Froch) July 4, 2015

Is say 2 years ago ggg has his way with frochy now not so much