How do you think Jacobs would do at 168?

**Hatesrats** · 03-20-2017, 10:35 AM

He would win a championship.

**Luilun** · 03-20-2017, 11:27 AM

Originally posted by Boxfan83

He looked pretty big for 160 but I understand he made the MW limit so he is still a MW. BUT if he decided to move-up, from what you seen against GGG (no matter how you judged it), do you think he can beat guys like Zurdo & Degale?

He will lose that's why he sucks down in weight he's also juicing

**NEETzsche** · 03-20-2017, 11:29 AM

168 is not that strong right now, I think he could potentially beat the top guys

**lopetego** · 03-20-2017, 11:31 AM

Pretty succesful. I can see him boxing slow ass Zurdo's ears off

**richardt** · 03-20-2017, 11:38 AM

Originally posted by lopetego

Pretty succesful. I can see him boxing slow ass Zurdo's ears off

Zurdo is one of the weakest "champs" in and around the division. They picked a gravy train process for him. He is slow, looping, and almost zero defense and wide open to the body and very little power.

**Madison Boxing** · 03-20-2017, 11:53 AM

He'd beat them all

**Cutthroat** · 03-20-2017, 11:54 AM

Same amount of success as Murray and Geale, none.

I'd pick a guy like Anthony Dirrell to destroy him and he's only around 9th in the division.

Anthony has a 75% KO ratio, 3" of height on DJ, 1.5" reach advantage, he's got W's over Bika, Rubio, Truax. Much better resume than DJ, never been down either.

168 is weak, but 160 is dog shyt.

**Zaryu** · 03-20-2017, 11:55 AM

He's talented enough to compete, I don't think he's big enough to be as effective up there.

**TRTboy** · 03-20-2017, 11:59 AM

He has the skills to compete with the best. He would do really good.

How do you think Jacobs would do at 168?