How the hell do u have it scored for rocky?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ferocity
    NOV. 3, NEW CHAMPION
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 15629
    • 313
    • 257
    • 23,031

    #11
    Originally posted by tonert
    well, if little jabs are what matters to one in boxing, then I could see how it could go to Barrera. But, to me, boxing is more than throwing a lot of little jabs that really don't do that much damage.

    It's a FIGHT. Who did the most damage??

    [img]http://www.*********.com/1photos/juarez_barrera2.jpg[/img]

    [img]http://www.*********.com/1photos/juarez_barrera1.jpg[/img]


    [IMG]http://www.*********.com/1photos/juarez_barrera6.jpg[/IMG]

    It's very hard to say that Barrera "won" that fight. Of course, if you work for HBO and have a lot of money down on it, then perhaps you can.

    Even after the fight and in the press conference, most thought Juarez had won.



    http://www.*********.com/rocco02.htm

    thanks for the info, they both got their faces bruised but barreras face looks like it took the worse of it.

    i don't see how barrera is going to go on without giving rocky a rematch, especially when the majority of the media felt rocky won.

    Comment

    • Zab Super Judah
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2004
      • 3894
      • 154
      • 4
      • 4,263

      #12
      personally it would be hard for me to see it as rocky winning. Barrera already won 6 rounds by the 8th round

      alot of people like giving the underdog more rounds than they really should. Theres no doubt that juarez could ahve done more in the first 7 rounds to win the fight. If he pushed the pace more, he didnt even seem tired. I cant see barrera takign a rematch cause he could lose if juarez pressures him and fights more from the get go

      but the fact of the matter is that barrera won this fight

      Comment

      • Zab Super Judah
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2004
        • 3894
        • 154
        • 4
        • 4,263

        #13
        Originally posted by tonert
        well, if little jabs are what matters to one in boxing, then I could see how it could go to Barrera. But, to me, boxing is more than throwing a lot of little jabs that really don't do that much damage.

        It's a FIGHT. Who did the most damage??

        [img]http://www.*********.com/1photos/juarez_barrera2.jpg[/img]

        [img]http://www.*********.com/1photos/juarez_barrera1.jpg[/img]


        [IMG]http://www.*********.com/1photos/juarez_barrera6.jpg[/IMG]

        It's very hard to say that Barrera "won" that fight. Of course, if you work for HBO and have a lot of money down on it, then perhaps you can.

        Even after the fight and in the press conference, most thought Juarez had won.



        http://www.*********.com/rocco02.htm
        yeah its about who does more damage. But what happens when someone wins 6 rounds by the 8th round. Most of rockys damage was in the late rounds when itwas too late. you cant lose all the early reounds and do more damage and expect to win a decision when u didnt win enough rounds

        Comment

        • ferocity
          NOV. 3, NEW CHAMPION
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Feb 2006
          • 15629
          • 313
          • 257
          • 23,031

          #14
          i didn't see barrera dominate the early rounds, in my opinon barrera fought rockys fight all night long

          Comment

          • 2OSouzaSuarez12
            HATTONS NUMBER 1 FAN!
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 1569
            • 90
            • 78
            • 8,044

            #15
            Well i had Barrera clearly winning, but it was a rough rough fight. Juarez is real strong, i think he would have a chance against Pac. Pac would come in throwing punches, not moving and jabbing like Barrera. He would come in and they would trade. Juarez has showed a decent chin, Pac has been KO'd before. So Pac and Juarez would be trading and i think it could go either way. Barrera didnt look spectacular last night but i do think he won. Juarez looked good too, i think he made a naem for himself but i really dont see him winning and ive watched the fight 3 times.

            Comment

            • tonert
              Amateur
              • May 2006
              • 23
              • 1
              • 0
              • 6,349

              #16
              I didn't think Juarez lost "all" the early rounds. I had Barrera at 5-3 through 8 rounds. Most were close, with Barrera getting some close nods due to his jab that didn't do as much relative damage. But, I also remember that Juarez did do some real damage to Barrera early on, and that as the fight went on the damage only got worse for Barrera. Barrera wasn't "boxing" as much later as he was in the earlier part of the fight when he won more of the rounds. I had Juarez winning more of the later rounds.

              I had no real problem with it being called a draw, but to call it a draw and then go back and change it after a so-called "scoring addition" just wreaks, especially when you see the scorecard tally, which clearly showed a *scorecard change* rather than an error. The card itself (posted in another thread here) originally showed a "10-9" 12th round from Morita for Juarez and then totaled it correctly as a "114" fight total for Barrera. There was no "scoring addition" error there. Then, someone went back and changed the "9" to a "10" for Barrera in the 12th round on Morita's card, which necessitated changing the fight total for Barrera from "114" to a "115". To me, it looks like a clear *scoring change*, not an error or miscalculation.
              Last edited by tonert; 05-21-2006, 03:38 PM.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP