GGG won on every criteria
Collapse
-
Comment
-
*Comment
-
Winning arguments is easy if we just completely make shyt up.Comment
-
Except, you completely made that up. That was not the argument. Kovalev won on stats, Ward won on the actual quality of the work done and how the individual rounds played out. I've never seen anyone say Ward won the output.
Winning arguments is easy if we just completely make shyt up.
nope ward fans were clinging to the landing % like how mayweather fans do every fight.
IT'S QUALITY OF WORK DOE!
But it doesn't even matter in this case because GGG outlanded Jacobs and had better efficiency.
SKILLS BABYComment
-
even if people say that after a fight to justify.. you dont know who has the higher % during a fight.. its not a scoring criteria.. its an after the fact "see i told you so and so was doing better"Comment
-
i'm just using the Ward/Floyd logic back on you idiots.
The scoring criteria =
Damage = GGG won that
Ring generalship = GGG held centre and was the aggressor. he won taht.
KD = GGG had that
Clean effective punching = GGG's jab did work. Jacobs was shoe-shiningComment
-
-
GGG landed more
GGG landed at higher %
GGG did more damage (look at danny's eyes and end of the fight draping on the ropes)
GGG had ring generalship (Danny was passive for the most part. outside)
GGG had the knockdown
It is what it is. Good effort from Jacobs. But it is what it is.Comment
Comment