How did you score Golovkin vs Jacobs

[HanzGruber]

115 112 ggg and i genuinely think I'm giving Jacobs the benefit of the doubt, could easily have been 116-111. Landed very few memorable shots. At least ggg was landing jabs and pressing the action. If you fight on the defensive you better make sure your clearly landing memorable shots. Jacobs didn't do that and he was outlanded in 9 of the rounds. Robbery cries are simply laughable.

you dont win rounds just by landing a few more punches via compubox man thats completely irrelevant.. you voted 7-5 GG. But by your logic its really 9-3 GG since he landed more punches..

[The Big Dunn]

This poll is crazy, nearly a perfect bell curve! Inverted in the middle, but great symmetry.

Needs to be a rematch- December '17, February '18 or March '18. Let Golovkin knock off BJS & Canelo in June/Sept and get Danny a big fight as well vs Lemieux/Lee/Eubank/Charlo/N'Dam.

The other thread was close as well. NSB is very split on this fight.

[TOBYLEE1]

7-5 Jacobs.

There were some close rounds in there that could had gone either way. So I am not outraged by the verdict or calling it a robbery.

[Jsmooth9876]

On live watch around like 5 other people I had it a draw with round 1 a 10-10 and giving GGG round 12 to even it up. 2 of my friends had it 115-112 GGG and anothe had it Jacobs by 2 points. So it could be seen many different ways I think.

Gotta watch again tonight and check back in with an updated score. I'm going to really watch the first round hard and give it to someone this time and declare a winner one way or the other.

[Madison Boxing]

you dont win rounds just by landing a few more punches via compubox man thats completely irrelevant.. you voted 7-5 GG. But by your logic its really 9-3 GG since he landed more punches..

He landed the harder shots. Trust me no-one knows more.about scoring a fight than me. I had it 115-112 so that's that, not open to debate.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

i had it GGG 13 to -1

[HanzGruber]

He landed the harder shots. Trust me no-one knows more.about scoring a fight than me. I had it 115-112 so that's that, not open to debate.

this post actually made me laugh out loud, good one m8

speaking of harder shots we should just score by compubox power shots per round then. Jacobs wins 8-4 if you do that. Sounds fair

[SilverMiles]

Watched again today for 3rd time and have to say the fight wasn't really that close, 8-4 to Golovkin. Jacobs couldn't get much done in the early rounds and was losing the boxing match.

Golovkin started getting sloppy in the middle rounds looking for the KO but by round 9 reeled it back in by hurting Jacobs and taking 2 of the final three rounds.

Coming down from the adrenaline rush doesn't help Jacobs. He mostly held in the early going and most of his power punches where more like slaps on the Calzaghe level.

[Madison Boxing]

this post actually made me laugh out loud, good one m8

speaking of harder shots we should just score by compubox power shots per round then. Jacobs wins 8-4 if you do that. Sounds fair

them 'power shots' werent power shots though. in life, sometimes when you want something to happen so bad, you start seeing a false reality. being 100 percent serious, i think people want golovkin to lose so much, that they start seeing things that didnt happen. In their minds they probably think they arent being bias, but they are scoring shots that arent landing, and overstating basic shots. They do it subconsciously. jacobs fought on the back foot, frustrated golovkin for sure, but he wasnt coming back with enough shots. People saying it could have gone either way, no it couldnt. Golovkin won, close but clear, no doubt about that.

[deathofaclown]

About 7-5 for GGG. I could see it 6-6 but even with the KD, GGG still wins.

No way did Jacobs win more than 6 rounds.

For me it was basically similar to Kovalev v Ward but the right man got the decision this time. Ward and Jacobs both did well but fell short when you tally up the winning rounds and bring factors like a Knockdown into play.