Jacobs cheated
Collapse
-
-
Props for not back pedaling on your beliefs. When you don't fight under the same guild lines as the other fighter you are cheating. I still believe not making weight should result in a loss. Then everyone would always make weight.Earlier I was trolling to get people going. Especially those who didn't say a peep last week before I posted that topic about Lemieux cheating. Some are consistent like Eff Pandas, Sicko, Mickey. Others never posted in that topic until today. And they still won't say Lemieux cheated. But that's neither here no there. We all have our biases. Not really here to boast or complain but to wish everyone a happy fight night. I'm headed to my fight party. I'll check in every now and then and post some pics later. Have fun

Comment
-
Cheating is coming it at the contracted weight limit? If you don't want to fight by the IBF rules then don't fight for their belt. Which is what Danny did.Comment
-
It wasn't cheating when Lemieux did it and it isn't cheating now that Jacobs does it.
As long as they make 160 on weigh-in day it's fair game after that.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
When you sign to fight for the IBF belt or any other belt you are stating that you will abide by their rules. A rule that Jacobs broke. That, sir, is cheating.
I posted this in the Lemieux thread and I will post it here again:
Did Jacobs act dishonestly or not? Is he trying to gain an advantage unfairly because he knows GGG is following the rule and only rehydrating so many pounds or not?cheat
CHēt/Submit
verb
gerund or present participle: cheating
1.
act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage, especially in a game or examination.Comment
Comment