Comments Thread For: Lomachenko Tabs Golovkin as The Top Pound for Pound Fighter
Collapse
-
-
You weirdos are entertaining Lol But what I saw him do against Russell, Martinez, and Walters was impressive stuff. Yeah he lost his second pro fight against a vet who knows how to survive; w/ a win in the rematch he's the likely P4P best. Now if Ward wins in convincing fashion in his rematch, then we have a different story.
In case you DON'T know Salido has like 14 losses and 4 draws. But want to ignore all that sht and make LOMA #1??? He beat Russell Doe! Who has Russell beat that makes him the DE FACTO on being a P4P??? Give me one good name? And not 100year old Gonzalez...Who WOW!!! Has 10 losses. Is that how???
Soo let me get this right??? Your P4P #1 if you beat the guy who beat a guy with 10 losses and lose to another guy with 14 losses???Comment
-
Kovalov looked like he could barely even stand in the 11 and 12 round. Sht he almost fell through the ropes in what round 11??? Kovalov is soo used to stomping guys he forgot fights can go 12 rounds. Kovalov CLEARLY won the 1st half and Ward CLEARLY won the 2nd half. Honestly I think it's going to be much easier in the 2nd fight for Ward. Just like how Floyd ALWAYS looked 10x better in rematches. I had Kovalov winning 7-5 but I can see why 1-2 rounds went for Ward in those. That quick knockdown was probably the WORST thing that could of happened for Kovalov. Because he went Full Rtard after that and became a head hunter the entire fight trying to recreate that knockdown and make it a knockout...Comment
-
You weirdos are entertaining Lol But what I saw him do against Russell, Martinez, and Walters was impressive stuff. Yeah he lost his second pro fight against a vet who knows how to survive; w/ a win in the rematch he's the likely P4P best. Now if Ward wins in convincing fashion in his rematch, then we have a different story.
Which CLEARLY Lomachenko did not PROVE. Because on 3-1-2014 SOMEONE else was BETTER than him on THAT NIGHT!!!!Comment
-
It says a lot about how biased people in this sport are when even Keith Thurman has a way better resume than GGG but somehow GGG is ranked in the top 3 p4p. Kovalev was outboxed by Ward but somehow he is in the top 3 above Ward. Pacquiao's last two victories are Bradley and Vargas, way better comp than anything GGG has faced, but somehow GGG ranked above him for facing relatively unproven welterweights and bums.
The great white hype fer real.Comment
-
It says a lot about how biased people in this sport are when even Keith Thurman has a way better resume than GGG but somehow GGG is ranked in the top 3 p4p. Kovalev was outboxed by Ward but somehow he is in the top 3 above Ward. Pacquiao's last two victories are Bradley and Vargas, way better comp than anything GGG has faced, but somehow GGG ranked above him for facing relatively unproven welterweights and bums.
The great white hype fer real.Last edited by g27region; 03-17-2017, 03:14 AM.Comment
-
Who was the better man for Lomachenko to beat at 130 if it wasn't Walters? Garcia and Gamboa who were rusty or retired at that moment? People were saying Walters will be a test for Loma before, but now they act like Walters is a bum, like he never had a chance against Loma and like he never KO'd a guy who was in top 5 p4p like Donaire. Before that fight, boxing fans were saying that Walters is the biggest challenge for Loma and you know he couldn't get better win at 130 at THAT period of time, but because the fight was one-sided people trying to discredit that win
Tell me just 1 name who would be a better win at 130 than Walters? Just one name
And I can name at least few guys who would be a way better win at 160 than Lemieux, starting with Jacobs
I was calling Lomachenko a BUM before Walters fight, but I can't do that anymore
And now you say Lemiuex was a better win, ha ha, no ****ing way.
Walters is a better win than anybody on Golovkin,Kovalev,Crawford or Garcia resumes
That goes to other guy in that thread who said Walters win wasn't that great and that p4p #1 means no one can beat you, I guess ATGs like Sugar Ray Leonard and others would never get a 1# place in his list, according to the same logicLast edited by g27region; 03-17-2017, 03:28 AM.Comment
-
100%
Yes they do bigtime. Its against their agenda to admit that because truthfully sports is all they have to bank on in life. When the truth reveals that Eastern Euro fighters are just on another level physically and mentally it will be to much for them to handle. Which is whyTHEY are living in denial.Comment
-
Eastern fighters dominating boxing.
They are predudiced and cowards the tmt and pbc trolls. Weak in boxing with their running safety first style in and out of the ring and society in generalComment
-
And then you have Crawford with his best two scalps - a chinny small guy coming from 2 divisions below and 1 year of inactivity in Gamboa, and former feather fisted (41% KO ratio) security guard from the food store with almost no amateur experice in Postol who's best accomplishment in boxing is beating overrated brawler Matthysse who quit because of the eye injury. That American hype is for real though. **** these anglos. Why you don't say that his place in p4p isn't deserved as well, according to your logic? Because it doesn't fit your agenda for bringing up races in every ****ing conversation?
Postal and Gamboa are better than ANYONE on Loma's AND GGG's resume.
SLAP yourself for even THINKING Lemuix or Walters is/was.
Guess who was the guy who DIDN'T lose to Salido??? Bingo you guessed it Gamboa.Comment
Comment