Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury Set For May 8 UKAD Hearing Over PED Violation Claim

[1hourRun]

It's not semantics .. it's you asking the same dumb question over and over when the answer is right there in the title of the thread you're posting in:

"Tyson Fury Set For May 8 UKAD Hearing Over PED Violation Claim"

Oh boy......last time I'm replying to you for now, its like you want to win so bad. My comment was directed at a passage in the article and I quote

'' The suspension imposed on Fury by the BBBofC is pending an investigation into an anti-doping violation of self-confessed ******* abuse. ''

Remember you said ******* is not a PED. I'm not going to go in where we got lost in translation. But don't concern yourself with a simpleton like me, I still appreciate your help.

[Jewish-Reptile]

https://*************/watch?v=nQrkBBjS7cs

[techliam]

Unified and lineal, but not undisputed.

undisputed, not Undisputed

[Jewish-Reptile]

just wipe the slate clean and let him return. hes getting himself back on track.

The dude was flagged before the Klitschko fight with PED's in his system and you feel he deserves a clean slate ?

[smooovey]

more bad reporting. tyson was never "undisputed champion" he never held the wbc belt! he was a unified champion. also no mention about hughie who was also involved with the nandrolone thing. if tyson really wants back on 13th he can get a licence from anywhere else like haye and chisora did. the bbboc is not the only power for licences