Comments Thread For: 7 Day Weights: Gennady Golovkin 162, Daniel Jacobs 167.8

[Chollo Vista]

Why are you so upset? You type a lot but nothing of substance.

3rd tampon boy to interject, but can't point out exactly what I said wrong. Just ad-hominem attacks

[yammy25]

3rd tampon boy to interject, but can't point out exactly what I said wrong. Just ad-hominem attacks

I think you need to look up the definition of ad-hominem attacks.

He directly questioned the substance of your argument.. you called him a tampon boy.

You are performing the ad-hominem attack LOL

Looking forward to seeing what you come up with IF jacobs loses.

Sincerely

The Entire NSB posting community.

[Chollo Vista]

I think you need to look up the definition of ad-hominem attacks.

He directly questioned the substance of your argument.. you called him a tampon boy.

You are performing the ad-hominem attack LOL

Looking forward to seeing what you come up with IF jacobs loses.

Sincerely

The Entire NSB posting community.

short for argumentum ad hominem, is a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance itself.

Out of all my posts in this thread, not one person has disputed the text of my posts. I've been asked why am I so upset and why don't I write like an adult, but nothing about the posts content itself.

And now I have someone trying to debate me about what ad-hominem really means as oppose to debating the content of my past posts that were written and ruffled so many feathers.

Do you want to talk about March 18th or do you want to talk about frivolous stuff that means jack schit?

[yammy25]

short for argumentum ad hominem, is a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the substance itself.

Out of all my posts in this thread, not one person has disputed the text of my posts. I've been asked why am I so upset and why don't I write like an adult, but nothing about the posts content itself.

And now I have someone trying to debate me about what ad-hominem really means as oppose to debating the content of my past posts that were written and ruffled so many feathers.

Do you want to talk about March 18th or do you want to talk about frivolous stuff that means jack schit?

Well done for googling ad-hominem and scrolling down to "what other people asked" and copying and pasting the text for "what is an ad hominem attack?"

Now take your threads over the last week or so, the basis of them ( arguing your points about Jacobs winning etc etc ) and then factor in you calling anyone who provides an alternative or opposing argument a "tampon boy" without dissecting their opposing view and that presents you with..

An ad-hominem attack.



There is no point talking March 18th with you Chollo.. you are incapable of holding a discussion and your "knowledge" is more often than not hindered by your xenophobic attitude.

PS. The Bold is a contradiction. You do indeed write like an angry child, and this is the content of your posts albeit not the content you want to use in your arguments.

[vaynardevil]

No one ever said GGG was weight drained.

It was you and your fellow Tampon Boys always bragging about GGG beating up Kovalev along with other Light Heavyweights, Cruiserweights and Heavyweights in sparring.

Oh, of course the claim of 154-168.

No one ever said GGG was weight drained, the people simply said if you are KO'ing Serghey Kovalev and Heavyweights in sparring, let's see you do it for real and not just talk.

Why is this so difficult for you Tampon Boys to understand??

fighting against LHW with his current weight is different than if they officially fight @175 class, that extra weight might drain his stamina quickly and ofc reduce his speed even slower

maybe he ko-ed some LHW/cruiser bums, i don't think he could do that against LHW/cruiser top contender/champ easily

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

I think you need to look up the definition of ad-hominem attacks.

He directly questioned the substance of your argument.. you called him a tampon boy.

You are performing the ad-hominem attack LOL

Looking forward to seeing what you come up with IF jacobs loses.

Sincerely

The Entire NSB posting community.

He seriously has no clue wtf he's talking about. Tries to sound educated but obviously fails at it. Accusing others of the exact same thing he does.

I believe the saying goes: A polished turd is still a turd.

[Chollo Vista]

Well done for googling ad-hominem

Well, I had to show you since you had no idea when in fact I was being AH attacked.

Now take your threads over the last week or so, the basis of them ( arguing your points about Jacobs winning etc etc ) and then factor in you calling anyone who provides an alternative or opposing argument a "tampon boy" without dissecting their opposing view and that presents you with.

Show me one post where someone logically broke down the fight and challenged what I said... I'm pretty sure you can't, because all of the posts where I said that had something to do with "Chollo needs to be banned, etc".

Secondly, like I told you before, if you knew the "HISTORY" of each poster that was called a Tampon Boy, it would make more sense. Being that you don't, well, of course it doesn't make sense.

holding a discussion and your "knowledge" is more often than not hindered by your xenophobic attitude

Looks like you used a word you really didn't understand. Please show me where I've shown I don't like someone from another country?

PS. The Bold is a contradiction. You do indeed write like an angry child, and this is the content of your posts albeit not the content you want to use in your arguments

And here we are almost an hour later and you still haven't challenged one thing I've said in any of my posts... Because you can't.

[Chollo Vista]

fighting against LHW with his current weight is different than if they officially fight @175 class, that extra weight might drain his stamina quickly and ofc reduce his speed even slower

maybe he ko-ed some LHW/cruiser bums, i don't think he could do that against LHW/cruiser top contender/champ easily

They said he KO'd Kovalev..

They said he can beat a prime Roy Jones Jr, Ray Robinson, etc... But when asked to prove it against Kovalev or Ward all you get are a bunch of excuses.

BTW, if GGG beats HW's in sparring while weighing 166, then why not just fight at 166 when fighting at SMW or LHW?

[Eastcoast]

I see you got your PED excuse in place once Jacobs busts that ass

Actually being with Conte makes me believe he's clean. Conte is the best legal supplements in the business. And your boy needs all the help he can get.

Jacobs has only been past the 8th 2x in his career!! Ishe Smith & Caleb Truax. Jacobs has never been the full 12 round distance! In the VICE documentary he killed himself to make weight vs Fletcher.

You're guy is going to gas bad vs GGG. He's not used to the distance, he's not used to the pressure, he's not used to having to fight this hard, and he's not used to this big of a spot light.

[Chollo Vista]

He seriously has no clue wtf he's talking about. Tries to sound educated but obviously fails at it. Accusing others of the exact same thing he does.

I believe the saying goes: A polished turd is still a turd.

Good to have you back... I remember when you said Garcia would eternally duck Mathysse. Once the fight got signed you said LM would butt **** Garcia and decapitate him.

Once Garcia proceeded to kick LM's ass, you then disappeared for 2 years. Everyone thought you killed yourself.

I remember when you said Broner would get his ass kicked by DeMarco. We see how that played out.

I remember you said Jacobs would duck GGG and run from the fight... Lol we see how that played out.

I remember you said Canelo would not only lose to, but duck Trout and Lara... Well we see how that played out.

Put simply, you sir, DKSAB and everyone knows.