Lamont Peterson would upset Keith Thurman

[boliodogs]

I disagree. Keith only ran from Garcia in the last 3 rounds after he was too far ahead to lose except by KO. Garcia was the one backing up in most of the early rounds.Keith came to Garcia's back yard and clearly beat him. Peterson ran from Garcia big time in the first 5 rounds and that cost him the fight. Peterson finished strong but he gave away too many early rounds to deserve to win or get a draw.Peterson is good but nothing special. Bradley knocked him down and won by a mile. Matthysse knocked him out.Kieth always wins and usually by KO. Keith has wins over Porter and Garcia. He is a stronger, better and more consistent fighter than Peterson with a much better record. In my opinion Thurman would beat Peterson and he wouldn't run from him.

[DoubleMM]

I disagree. Keith only ran from Garcia in the last 3 rounds after he was too far ahead to lose except by KO. Garcia was the one backing up in most of the early rounds.Keith came to Garcia's back yard and clearly beat him. Peterson ran from Garcia big time in the first 5 rounds and that cost him the fight. Peterson finished strong but he gave away too many early rounds to deserve to win or get a draw.Peterson is good but nothing special. Bradley knocked him down and won by a mile. Matthysse knocked him out.Kieth always wins and usually by KO. Keith has wins over Porter and Garcia. He is a stronger, better and more consistent fighter than Peterson with a much better record. In my opinion Thurman would beat Peterson and he wouldn't run from him.

Have you seen Thurman fight?

He is a low volume puncher and can't fight on the inside.

Slow ass Shawn Porter was bullying him around lmao.

What do you think a fighter who can cut the ring off and fight on the inside will do to him?

[TheUptownKid]

So what????

Fighters get touched

ALL fighters do.

Peterson got touched PLENTY....even KTFO

Yeah 5 years ago. I just think thurmans defense is leaky enough for him to lose rounds if his activity isn't high, which we've seen. We've also seen that he doesn't typically dictate the pace of a round except to evade, Lamont can steal those rounds. Keith also has shown that he isn't comfortable on the inside which Peterson loves. Peterson has advantages just like Thurman would

[TheUptownKid]

I disagree. Keith only ran from Garcia in the last 3 rounds after he was too far ahead to lose except by KO. Garcia was the one backing up in most of the early rounds.Keith came to Garcia's back yard and clearly beat him. Peterson ran from Garcia big time in the first 5 rounds and that cost him the fight. Peterson finished strong but he gave away too many early rounds to deserve to win or get a draw.Peterson is good but nothing special. Bradley knocked him down and won by a mile. Matthysse knocked him out.Kieth always wins and usually by KO. Keith has wins over Porter and Garcia. He is a stronger, better and more consistent fighter than Peterson with a much better record. In my opinion Thurman would beat Peterson and he wouldn't run from him.

What makes him more consistent, is it the different competition? The 0? Because Lamont has fought far better competition and in my eyes has better (at least more dominant) performances versus elite competition.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

no, it's clear as day Thurman can't fight on the inside.

If slow ass wide punching can almost beat Thurman and put Thurman on the ropes, Lamont Peterson can do it.

Lamont is a way better inside fighte and way better skilled fighter then Porter.

Lamont TKO Run TIme.,

Hopefully you will be as confident once the fight comes around and put all your points on the line with someone. Then we will never hear from you again. This place can do without a few peeps like you.

[BucaRican]

if he has no kind of powr why was danny garcia bneat up and close to getting stopped? why did luis collazo hurt thurman and have him running?

shawn porter slow and wild ass had thurman cut off, peterson is better then shawn porter.

Lucas Matthysse?????????? No mention of that. Lucas Matthysse a flat footed boxer with no type of movement. A guy that had no respect for his power worked and mopped him. Get out of here with that.

[DoubleMM]

Hopefully you will be as confident once the fight comes around and put all your points on the line with someone. Then we will never hear from you again. This place can do without a few peeps like you.

I will be betting real money. I'd love to see the odds because I'm going to unload on Peterson at underdog money.

[HanzGruber]

Thurman looked like ****, complete ****, I will be betting aginst him in the future.

Thurman is sloppy as hell lmao, this ugy is a hypejob.

no boxing skill

zero jab just relies on one puch counter shots.

weak body and low work rate.

like i said, youve been saying it for years look a the date on those posts. when are you gonna give him his ***ing props, he just unified a fight you said hed lose ffs

thurman beats porter and garcia, still thinks hes a bum you are nuts

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

like i said, youve been saying it for years look a the date on those posts. when are you gonna give him his ***ing props, he just unified a fight you said hed lose ffs

thurman beats porter and garcia, still thinks hes a bum you are nuts

"Will be betting against him in the future."

"Zero boxing skills."

I'm sure this dude is full of **** but if he did bet I wonder how much he lost betting on Garcia.

And Thurman ZERO boxing skills.

[-Kev-]

Lamont Peterson always comes up short. He somehow gets a lot of credit from judges and fans. For example I had Khan beating him by 1 point, I had Ortiz beating him comfortably and iirc Ortiz even knocked him down and it was a 10 round fight, so idk how the judges found 5 rounds to give to Peterson. He won 3, 4 at best, minus the KD. I thought Garcia edged him. Bradley beat him the clearest out of all his decision losses and obviously Matthysse stopped him easily, it was a mismatch.

Anyone who feels Peterson beats Thurman has such little evidence for that claim that they have to just be going against the grain for the hell of it.