Jacobs: GGG has good offense, but bad defense! I'll expose it!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mequetrefe
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2016
    • 1274
    • 56
    • 0
    • 14,670

    #91
    Originally posted by Kigali
    Keep clutching your rosary beads amigo.

    The memes if GGG loses would be better..you won't be around to see them though.
    Originally posted by Kigali
    Not for long....
    So you're saying Jacobs will win???????????? Oooook then.

    Comment

    • DocGreenThumb.
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 1283
      • 36
      • 58
      • 10,849

      #92
      Originally posted by j.razor
      Lol..I know I was messing with you I know bout that "mate" talk we just don't use that round here....but on the real getting in that ring will help give you more of a prospective in boxing, that's why Paulie is the best commentator in the game now and it's not even close especially if we got Jim lamply and Harold letterman in the game (can't wait till they leave boxing)...but to answer your question we are always taught to work off you jab.
      Agreed thank you! Some one who knows boxing Paulie was a perfect example of how a great jab can keep you in the fight game when you have limited power. By the way I miss Foreman and Lennix Lewis commentating fights, telling it like it is instead of latching on to the house fighters. Lampley with his lame **** **** special effects and Ledderman with his bias judging ignoring body shots as points and giving rounds to fighters just because he threw more punches than the last round. Doesn't mean they landed enough of those punches to score points. Or fighter lands most of his punches in the last 15 sec and he won that round. Bias judging is the worst and what turns off people off on boxing.

      Comment

      • KingTito
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2006
        • 9391
        • 234
        • 350
        • 22,960

        #93
        I expect GGG to have a great jab come fight night. He's not ******. He knows Jacobs is dangerous. He's shown he can do it with Lemieux. GGG will be at a disadvantage in height and reach that he wasn't at with Lemieux though, and Jacobs is better, so I'm curious to see how it plays out. But I keep coming back to one thing. I don't trust Jacobs' chin. If GGG lands flush, it will 100% be over. Jacobs will have to be careful. I don't see him making it out though.

        Comment

        • j.razor
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2007
          • 23786
          • 265
          • 0
          • 227,586,034

          #94
          Originally posted by DocGreenThumb.
          Agreed thank you! Some one who knows boxing Paulie was a perfect example of how a great jab can keep you in the fight game when you have limited power. By the way I miss Foreman and Lennix Lewis commentating fights, telling it like it is instead of latching on to the house fighters. Lampley with his lame **** **** special effects and Ledderman with his bias judging ignoring body shots as points and giving rounds to fighters just because he threw more punches than the last round. Doesn't mean they landed enough of those punches to score points. Or fighter lands most of his punches in the last 15 sec and he won that round. Bias judging is the worst and what turns off people off on boxing.
          So true but I have a feeling that the station (hbo) has them speak a certain tune cuz when Max was with espn Friday night fights he was real good even when he went to hbo after the Mayweather vs Delahoya he was on point but then right after that fight his tune completely changed and Roy only says some things but seems like someone is in his ear telling him you work for us not them....

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP