Do people know what a "Robbery" is?

[Elroy The Great]

So you would score a round for a guy that lands 5 pitty pat arm punches, over a guy that lands 3 full weight punches solid?

That guy landed 40% more often~

do scorecards have that option ?

[The Gambler1981]

do scorecards have that option ?

10-9 or 9-10 which one do you go for. That is the inherent flaw in boxing judging because that call needs to be made some will go one way and some the other.

[Elroy The Great]

10-9 or 9-10 which one do you go for. That is the inherent flaw in boxing judging because that call needs to be made some will go one way and some the other.

not everyone is a ****er.

and if those monster shots are only good for making sweat fly, bfd.

if monster shots dont phase the guy, 10-9 for the guy who landed more.

[Motorcity Cobra]

That wasn't a close fight

97-93 broner is a horrible scorecard...

I didn't realize people thought it was a close fight until I got home and got on Twitter and on here. That fight was not close at all. Broner won that going away

[The Gambler1981]

not everyone is a ****er.

and if those monster shots are only good for making sweat fly, bfd.

if monster shots dont phase the guy, 10-9 for the guy who landed more.

If they make the other guys head move they are easier for judges to see, if the stop the guy in his tracks while the others just bounce off uselessly.

Logically those should not be counted as equal.


But like I said some will like it your way, and others a different way.

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

I didn't realize people thought it was a close fight until I got home and got on Twitter and on here. That fight was not close at all. Broner won that going away

PSSSSShhhhhhhhhhhh GTFOH

Granados won.

[Elroy The Great]

If they make the other guys head move they are easier for judges to see, if the stop the guy in his tracks while the others just bounce off uselessly.

Logically those should not be counted as equal.


But like I said some will like it your way, and others a different way.

im giving you every benefit of the doubt but dont say ''soft'' shots are all of a sudden hard to score.

tbh, most judges give ****ers extra credit for shots landed on arms and shoulders and sloppy aggression.

[Motorcity Cobra]

PSSSSShhhhhhhhhhhh GTFOH

Granados won.

I was sitting next to a guy from Granados team. He thought Granados lost. Nobody in the arena thought Granados won the fight. Broner shots were cleaner. Granados kept coming forward but wasn't landing anything clean

[The Gambler1981]

im giving you every benefit of the doubt but dont say ''soft'' shots are all of a sudden hard to score.

tbh, most judges give ****ers extra credit for shots landed on arms and shoulders and sloppy aggression.

I am not saying they don't, and I am not saying scoring the strength of shots is any more valid really it is just an alternate way of scoring a fight and if a guy is landing the better shots they should logically count for more.

Soft shots are harder to score because you don't hear the crack of the shot landing, or see the visible impact. It is why if a guy lands only jabs and the other guy lands fewer shots but all power punches more often than not the guy landing the power shots will win. If the guy does a great jab snapping the guys head with a jab they certainly stand a better chance than a guy landing pawing jabs though.

[Elroy The Great]

I am not saying they don't, and I am not saying scoring the strength of shots is any more valid really it is just an alternate way of scoring a fight and if a guy is landing the better shots they should logically count for more.

Soft shots are harder to score because you don't hear the crack of the shot landing, or see the visible impact. It is why if a guy lands only jabs and the other guy lands fewer shots but all power punches more often than not the guy landing the power shots will win. If the guy does a great jab snapping the guys head with a jab they certainly stand a better chance than a guy landing pawing jabs though.

no one ''likes'' jabfests or clinch-a-thons. still, not all guys are ****ers.

or, like timmy, are flashy but ineffective as sluggers.

all things being equal (all punches are visibly scored), i have to side with quantity over ''quality''. no way to prove a shot is quality if they dont do any harm.

just mho