Comments Thread For: Spence: Brook Getting Too Much Credit, Tried to Find a Way Out

[al-Xander]

When the fight happens Spence will be 27, Brook will be 31. In boxing, that's a big difference! That 31 year old is going to feel it when he's trying to make 147, and he's going to feel it around Round 6, when Spence is cracking that mid-section!

Bundu was 41 when Spence fought him. It was a fight made in heaven for Errol. Fourteen years difference as opposed to four this time with Kell.

[Bronx2245]

Bundu was 41 when Spence fought him. It was a fight made in heaven for Errol. Fourteen years difference as opposed to four this time with Kell.

Frankie Gavin, Jo Jo Dan, and Kevin Bizier were all gifts from Heaven for Kell Brook!

[RomanReigns]

Frankie Gavin, Jo Jo Dan, and Kevin Bizier were all gifts from Heaven for Kell Brook!

Brooks has a terrible resume for a 13 yrs. Veteran. Porter is the best win of his career. His clinching won't work against Spence.

[Apollo7]

Of course Brook tried to get the bigger fights first, why wouldn't he?

Brook could have used the weight as an excuse if he wanted to avoid Spence. Could have moved up and fought an easy opponent seeing as he would be in s new division, coming off a loss and injury.

[al-Xander]

Frankie Gavin, Jo Jo Dan, and Kevin Bizier were all gifts from Heaven for Kell Brook!

Doe, you just admitted the huge age difference between Kell and Errol. Bundu/Spence was even bigger!

[RomanReigns]

Of course Brook tried to get the bigger fights first, why wouldn't he?

Brook could have used the weight as an excuse if he wanted to avoid Spence. Could have moved up and fought an easy opponent seeing as he would be in s new division, coming off a loss and injury.

He's been fighting easy opponents in his boxing career with the exception of porter and golovkin fights.

[RomanReigns]

Doe, you just admitted the huge age difference between Kell and Errol. Bundu/Spence was even bigger!

Bundu. turned pro at age 31. Thurman failed to stop him. And Spence steam rolled him.

[NahMean]

Shouldn’t Spence be saying Brook deserves massive credit for taking on a dangerous fighter like himself??… Spence is basically saying that he doesn’t believe that he is any sort of threat so Brook doesn’t deserve credit. Brook got credit for fighting GGG because of the danger he possessed. I think Spence is right.. He isn’t proven so Brook shouldn’t get credit for fighting him.. Brook should only get credit if he fights real top 5 fighters like DSG/Thurman winner or maybe Canelo. Very modest of Spence to accept that he is still an unproven nobody in the WW division

[Kigali]

I thought Brook was ducking and would vacate?

You get ridiculed on your main and alt account.

Even Brook's Countrymen thought he'd vacate.

I'm glad he didn't.

Now clutch your rosary beads and pray for a Brook victory,

[frantic fighter]

Nope not going to let you set up that excuse right there buddy😂 especially after all this talking you UK fanboys of brook do lol. "if he's not a skeleton" LMAO already starting the excuses.. it'll be his eye injury next. Nope, he loses the fight it means he loss to the better man and vise versa. Alot of people believe Spence will run the 147lbs division real soon anyway. No excuses bro, just get ready to be disappointed.

Yeah, I'm an American and what I said was valid. Brook an already decent sized Welterweight packed on even more weight to take on Golovkin. I think given that all we know waiting to make a prediction at the weigh in is very reasonable.