Comments Thread For: Kell Brook To Errol Spence: I Won't Vacate, You Are Next!

[yngwie]

I don't want to see neither of these guys losing and i wouldn't mind it because that happens when the best face the best, but boxing fans are some of the mos hypocritical fans in sports.

[FLY TY]

After he loses he'll blame his L on having to drain himself to make WW...."oooh I should've listened to my team and gone up to 154 blah blah blah"....they already "planted" the excuse in the media

Pretty much sums up the post-fight interview.

Although as they've stated in the past, he can make 147 "for the right fight."

[BoxingJunkie]

Errol Spence, Jr. is getting it!

Yes, you are right... Errol Spence is getting Kell Brooks IBO title!

[boliodogs]

Fighting Spence is the right thing to do.Good for Brook. A good champion fights the best challenger even if he loses. I am sure Spence will knock him out but win, lose or draw I admire him for fighting Spence when the other top welterweights don't want to fight him.

[BoxingJunkie]

Lol, this must be the ******est comment ever on this forum. You speak as though Errol Spence is some low level mandatory that has no chance of beating Kell, like ALL his other mandatories. It seemed all but certain that Kell was going to duck this challenge so kudos to Kell for stepping up

[Boxing Logic]

You're celebrating the fact that Brook is fighting his mamdatory? The bar is low for certain boxers.

The bar is low for the whole sport now ever since floyd lowered it and convinced his racial fan boys that was acceptable. keith thurman spelled it all out how floyd ducked him while he was mandatory. he ducked pacman when pac was mandatory too or at least said he would ignore the belts if they tried to mandate it. since ggg kovalev and a few others are the only ones fighting anyone in their division these days, it deserves to be credited if brook does it.

[FrankieClutch]

f.ck yes!!!

[OnePunch]

You're celebrating the fact that Brook is fighting his mamdatory? The bar is low for certain boxers.

Actually, yes.

these days a fighter can avoid his mando and even go so far as to give up his title, and some around here will be like "a-side bidness doe, shot caller derp derp derp"

So yes, I celebrate him fighting a very tough mando. I wish he hadnt ****ed around the past month with all the "maybes", but still, props for fighting the kid.....

[deathofaclown]

Did he? Porter was considered a bit of a destroyer at the time he went to the states to beat him..

So true. People need to go back in time on this forum before Brook v Porter. People were saying Floyd would never fight Porter and they were talking like he was a monster. People will say that isn't true but it's all here on the forum.

[mathed]

Did he? Porter was considered a bit of a destroyer at the time he went to the states to beat him. He fights Golovkin and now Spence. But still a ducker, scared of Bradley? Really? Doubt it.

http://www.espn.com/blog/dan-rafael/...-bradley-offer