Updated Boxing Odds

[Eff Pandas]

Feb 18, 2017 - Broner VS Grandos

Broner Win -1600
Grandos Win +800
Draw +2500
Broner TKO -115
Broner Decision -115
Grandos TKO +950
Grandos Decision +2500

Cmon guys when have you ever seen odds for a guy to win a decision be the same as a draw? Mfer trolling.

I was hoping it was a ****** betting site til I seen that. No sports book is making a draw & a guy winning by the decision at the same odds.

[SeekDaGreat]

Did you make up those odds or just get them from some ****** betting site? I hope its a ****** betting site cuz you can hedge the f#ck outta fights & make no lose situations galore with those bs odds vs legit odds.

What's the point of betting if you're hedging all your bets and just not losing, instead of actually taking the odds and getting paid (provided you win.) Or is there same way to hedge the bet and still make a killing? I never gambled to just barely come out on top (or float around breaking even, or a little better than.) it seems pointless to me?

Serious question. For an unexperienced gambler.

[SeekDaGreat]

Cmon guys when have you ever seen odds for a guy to win a decision be the same as a draw? Mfer trolling.

I was hoping it was a ****** betting site til I seen that. No sports book is making a draw & a guy winning by the decision at the same odds.

Wouldnt the odds be pretty similar considering the difference between a draw and a decision win is literally one point, could literally be one punch?

Again, serious inquiry from unexoerienced gambler.

[Madison Boxing]

Wow had no clue canelo fight was a pickem

its not, i dont know if sadiq has made these odds up or what. Canelo is 1/10 on to win with the bookies, thats what i got when i googled it. I know joshua is a clear favourite over wlad with the bookies too.

[Eff Pandas]

What's the point of betting if you're hedging all your bets and just not losing, instead of actually taking the odds and getting paid (provided you win.) Or is there same way to hedge the bet and still make a killing? I never gambled to just barely come out on top (or float around breaking even, or a little better than.) it seems pointless to me?

Serious question. For an unexperienced gambler.

Guaranteeing a profit. And you can bet however much you want to secure however much you want min & max depending on which side wins. A bet on just one side will pay more if you win, but pays nothing if you lose. A 100% chance to win beats a 55-65% chance (assuming you are one of the best bettors in the world for most sports) to win basically.

[Eff Pandas]

Wouldnt the odds be pretty similar considering the difference between a draw and a decision win is literally one point, could literally be one punch?

Again, serious inquiry from unexoerienced gambler.

Nah. Draws are extremely rare. I mean cmon bro how many fighters do you see with more draws then L's even?

I might be getting re-trolled here wtf lol.

[mlac]

Are these odds from Sadiq's make believe bookies where he bet 18k on klitschko ?

[BrometheusBob.]

What source did you use?

Personally I think Broner too wide, Thurman too wide, Wilder not wide enough, Canelo should be the clear favorite.

Golovkin being a 20/1 favorite made me chuckle a little. All the bookies know Jacobs is getting obliterated.

[BrometheusBob.]

Are these odds from Sadiq's make believe bookies where he bet 18k on klitschko ?

[SeekDaGreat]

Nah. Draws are extremely rare. I mean cmon bro how many fighters do you see with more draws then L's even?

I might be getting re-trolled here wtf lol.

I wasn't trolling you. Thanks for your input.