Why is CW a bad thing for some ppl

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HandsofIron
    Super Champion in Recess
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2014
    • 3947
    • 736
    • 765
    • 25,198

    #11
    Catchweights can be exploited and provide an unfair advantage of. They have been grossly abused in the modern era. Ex. Pacquaio-Margarito, Mayweather-Alvarez, Cotto-Martinez

    Boxing already has 17 weight classes, there's honestly no need for catchweights. If a boxer can't move up then he or she needs to stay in their own lane and not make demands or stipulations for a bigger guy to drop down, that's not what boxing is about.

    However, I have no problem with a catchweight being used to make a fight if both fighters are in the same weight class and one fighter fails to make weight or whatever, then they can readjust the weight.

    The bad catchweights is when one smaller boxer asks a bigger opponent to drop down in weight.

    Comment

    • Tony Trick-Pony
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2014
      • 16950
      • 1,408
      • 3,121
      • 139,355

      #12
      Originally posted by Canelo and GGG
      IT makes Fights happen and both sides accept it,its blessing for boxing and made some fights that would never happen otherwise.
      I don't agree with it when it comes to title fights. A fight for the middleweight title should be fought at 160- no exceptions.

      Outside of titles, though, I have no problem with it. Whatever makes the fight happen.

      Comment

      • Larry the boss
        EDUCATED
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 90798
        • 6,419
        • 4,473
        • 2,500,480

        #13
        Originally posted by deathofaclown
        I have no problem if it's 2 of the best fighters from two weights meeting half way to get the fight done, that's acceptable. Ward v Dawson would have been acceptable and a good example, but Ward dragging him down to 168 was criminal.

        It's a problem when one is purposely dragging the other down in weight for no good reason, especially when they're about the same size. i.e Canelo wanting to fight Golovkin at 155 or something, even though they both held MW titles.

        I don't think catch-weights are bad in some cases, it's just that some fighters abuse it to get an advantage.
        168 was Dawsons idea..not sure why people blame Ward

        Comment

        • KillaCamNZ
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2016
          • 3967
          • 200
          • 156
          • 29,082

          #14
          Catchweight fights are fine. Catchweight title fights are not.

          Comment

          • pacmanis1
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 2218
            • 137
            • 108
            • 16,982

            #15
            When was the last time a CW was even legitimately needed and not used as some A-side draining tactic? Chavez and Canelo makes sense to have one but did Cotto vs Geale? I mean in a day and age of 17 weight classes are they really needed?

            Comment

            • AddiX
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 7865
              • 416
              • 45
              • 30,565

              #16
              Here's the thing, in today's boxing landscape you need catchweighths.

              The sport isn't as big as it once was and there isn't as many stars, so to get that payday, you might need to do a catchweight fight.

              Just the way it is.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP