Is Daniel Jacobs being underestimated?...
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Good post super points made. I really think based on what you have said that Jacobs can win. I have no doubt. As stated he can crack and I'm going to stick on £50 on Jacobs unanimous Dec.Comment
-
GGG spars and knocks out Light Heavies, no ? I'm sure you're one of the GGG fan boys who's been pushing this. If light heavies don't trouble him in sparring what is a middle weight with a tendency for rolling around the canvass against light hitting guys like Mora going to do ? Kell Brook was a dangerous opponent too wasnt he ?
Humour me.Comment
-
nah im not, sparrings sparring. If golovkin gets caught by jacobs hes in trouble, simple as that. Hes a much stronger fighter than he was against pirog, look at the physical transformation broGGG spars and knocks out Light Heavies, no ? I'm sure you're one of the GGG fan boys who's been pushing this. If light heavies don't trouble him in sparring what is a middle weight with a tendency for rolling around the canvass against light hitting guys like Mora going to do ? Kell Brook was a dangerous opponent too wasnt he ?
Humour me.Comment
-
-
I've said this already but I will reiterate it once more Jacobs is the toughest challenge at 160 yet and here is the catch, Jacobs aint good enough, strong enough or durable enough.
GGG needs to move up for legacy sake, if defeating Jacobs and Flounders giving him the damn belt speeds that up I'm all for it, because I sure as hell don't wanna see Flounders vs GGG.
GGG can clear out 168 as he has 160, this is what begrudges me with him loitering around 160 for east pay days against over matched opponents in glorified mismatches, anybody yourself included who suggests these fights at pre competitive like they did Brook aren't real boxing fans, period.Comment
Comment