Comments Thread For: To Immediate Rematch Or Not To Immediate Rematch

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

By Andreas Hale - It appears that we're about to add another entry into boxing's book of great trilogies after Leo Santa Cruz squeezed out a majority decision in his rematch with Carl Frampton last weekend. Clearly, these two are made for each other. While the first fight was a barnburner and "Fight of the Year" candidate, the rematch found Santa Cruz taking a more measured approach to the fight and went from a hurricane of punches to a strategic twister...
[Click Here To Read More]

[Jewish-Reptile]

I'd rather see Cruz unify than rematch now, Frampton can face Selby down the line too plenty of options available hell even Selby vs Cruz rather than a rematch again. I really want to see Warrington versus Russell than Russell unifying too.

[Madison Boxing]

not generally a fan of immediate rematches unless theres some serious controversy, like the froch groves stoppage

[*TonyMontana*]

Let them both take fights
Build the 3rd fight a bit
I felt like there wasn't much of a buzz for the rematch

[Shadoww702]

Leo should honor the rematch and do it in Belfast as it's only fair.

[Dle]

LSC never committed to doing the rematch in Belgium. He sad Las Vegas , here, or Belgium. Not exclusive Belgium. Furthermore, he mgt team makes those decisions. Frampton chose to come here to fight for the title, plus there was a rematch clause. There's no further rematch clause in effect. LAS VEGAS!