Should Wilder vs. Wawrzyk be a non title fight?

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • boliodogs
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 33358
    • 824
    • 1,782
    • 309,589
    #11
    Years ago maybe so. Today the standard for a title fight are lower. They used to be expected to fight a top 10 guy. Now anybody rated in the top 15 of of the organization they are champion of qualifies as a legit title fight. Even though most of us never heard of this guy he is rated in the WBC top 15 so it's a title fight. Lara just defended his title against a guy boxrec rated about 119th but he was rated in the top 15 by the WBA so it was OK.

      Comment

      • gauze
        white lives matter
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 4184
        • 641
        • 328
        • 10,187
        #12
        it should be a title unification

          Comment

          • The Hammer
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 50797
            • 3,416
            • 8,704
            • 58,851
            #13
            Originally posted by Kigali
            Why not?

            GGG vs Adama was a title fight.
            Come on now, Adama is far tougher than the very fragile Wawrzyk.

              Comment

              Previous 1 2 template Next
              Working...
              TOP

              Sign In

              Forgot password?

              Register

              Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
              JOIN NOW