Why Does Golovkin constantly say he's a ''small Middleweight?''

[CaneloMaidana]

Seek professional help, you need it sugar

None of you cowards will answer the question.

[Lester Tutor]

None of you cowards will answer the question.

In the video he says the ''Lineal means nothing.'' ''Canelo means nothing.'' lol

Therefore, what is a WBO worth!? dem are serious questions! The ''all the belts'' myth is soon to become debunked for K2. They will move up after Jacobs.

[asgarth]

going for the wbo makes him the undisputed champion not automatically the lineal champ

[Derranged]

He said it like once and that was probably nothing more than a futile attempt to justify the sham of a fight with Brook. He might have also said that to justify staying at 160 where he's holding out for a huge pay day against Ronaldo McDonald as opposed to moving up in weight and making way less money.

And what is your obsession with Golovkin? Seriously, that's more or less all you post about. Are you even a boxing fan?

[Lester Tutor]

going for the wbo makes him the undisputed champion not automatically the lineal champ

so going for the WBO means more when asked about the importance of the Ring belt or lineal and says ''It's nothing..'' Yet Golovkin always embraces the importance of Sugar Ray and Hagler whom rocked the Ring honor and Lineal?

inconsistencies....

Golovkin only says, ''my focus is 160'' and doesn't even mention the WBO or Saunders' name. Ideally, THE BOUT against Saunders would IDEALLY be sanctioned as The Ring bout as it's the bottleneck for ''all the belts legacy'' and being truly #1.

Funny how Golovkin never mentions Saunders or the WBO in any interview like any normal boxer would who wants all the belts...

strange.

[CaneloMaidana]

He said it like once and that was probably nothing more than a futile attempt to justify the sham of a fight with Brook. He might have also said that to justify staying at 160 where he's holding out for a huge pay day against Ronaldo McDonald as opposed to moving up in weight and making way less money.

And what is your obsession with Golovkin? Seriously, that's more or less all you post about. Are you even a boxing fan?

Golovkin is boxing's cancer. A protected little fraud who won't step up.

[Zaryu]

Maybe he just means he's smaller than most MWs competing at his level, as in he usually weighs less than his opponents?

[asgarth]

so going for the WBO means more when asked about the importance of the Ring belt or lineal and says ''It's nothing..'' Yet Golovkin always embraces the importance of Sugar Ray and Hagler whom rocked the Ring honor and Lineal?

inconsistencies....

Golovkin only says, ''my focus is 160'' and doesn't even mention the WBO or Saunders' name. Ideally, THE BOUT against Saunders would IDEALLY be sanctioned as The Ring bout as it's the bottleneck for ''all the belts legacy'' and being truly #1.

Funny how Golovkin never mentions Saunders or the WBO in any interview like any normal boxer would who wants all the belts...

strange.

i dont have the time to watch every single interview, but a quick google search "golovkin AND saunders" gives you more than enough results.

And even then, Golovkin cant really express himself in english, so people shouldnt take everything he says completely serious.

the lineal championship has, in the case of canelo, no importance, because the way the title was passed was laughable.
Martinez lost it at a catchweight, Cotto defended it at a catchweight, subsequently lost the title at a catchweight against canelo. Canelo defended the title at a catchweight against Khan.

So the lineal title wasnt fought for at the 160 limit for 4 straight fights.

[Derranged]

Golovkin is boxing's cancer. A protected little fraud who won't step up.

Get lost you fat ******. You're an even worse troll than the thread starter.

[CaneloMaidana]

Get lost you fat ******. You're an even worse troll than the thread starter.

Aww little coward. Did I attack your hero you fat coward.