No they don't. Beating groves who was stopped twice isn't better than beating undefeated quillen. And beat an over the hill direll isn't a great feat. What solid fighter did jack beat?
nope. we can debate about that "win" and Andre Direll being better than Kid Chocolate.
However, we can't debate that Degale arguably lost to 2 absolute bums in Medina and Piotr. Degale also has a draw against a mediocre Jack on top of that.
we have to look at the whole resume.
You want a constructive opinion as to why,but you seem to try and refute every single one of them,so what is the point..When someone wants to argue their point of view,its an endless argument..Makes no sense.
Comment