1 Judge Had Eubank Jr 7 Rounds, Saunders 4 Rounds -- Watch & Score It [FULL FIGHT]

[FlatLine]

Flashback to Eubank Jr's only "defeat", it was officially a Split Decision win for Saunders but one of the judges saw it very much in Eubank's favour, awarding him 7 rounds, Saunders 4 rounds and scoring one round a draw.

From Chris Eubank Jr's official YouTube channel, watch the fight and drop your scorecard:

[A.K]

Any judge that scores draw rounds dksab

[FlatLine]

Any judge that scores draw rounds dksab

If it's a very close round, which you could arguably award to either boxer, then a draw is actually the fair & correct method of scoring the round.

In fact it wasn't only one judge but also one of the other judges scored a draw round in that fight too.

[A.K]

If it's a very close round, which you could arguably award to either boxer, then a draw is actually the fair & correct method of scoring the round.

In fact it wasn't only one judge but also one of the other judges scored a draw round in that fight too.

No it's not.. in most commissions In the states they would lose their job someone has to win the round no such thing as a draw round..like i said draw rounds = dksab

[Madison Boxing]

No it's not.. in most commissions In the states they would lose their job someone has to win the round no such thing as a draw round..like i said draw rounds = dksab

should score more draw rounds imo. Dont see why its discouraged. If neither fighter lands good shots then they shouldnt be awarded the round, otherwise it basically ends up flipping a coin as to who you thought won a round.

[FlatLine]

No it's not.. in most commissions In the states they would lose their job someone has to win the round no such thing as a draw round..like i said draw rounds = dksab

What commissions look for is a score which accurately reflects the outcome of the round, so that's the reason a draw round exists as a possible scoring option because sometimes it's the most accurate way to score the round. Draw rounds basically provide the option of a more finely-tuned final scorecard which, in posterity, can help to indicate how close a round was, or indeed how close the fight was.

If you limit yourself to just scoring the round for one fighter or the other, and you staunchly resist scoring a draw round based of some principle of "dksab", then all you're doing is reducing the overall accuracy of your own scorecard.

[Dc9147]

Saunders won eight rounds to four.

[hugh grant]

Eubank stepped up in class and did well. He'd beat bjs in return I'm sure of that. Eubank improved and bjsif he takes foot of the dedication to boxing and not train and ignores diet just a little bjs resembles bum in the ring.

Eubank must beat nelo first to get ggg

[Zaroku]

Eubank gave away too many early rounds.

[alexguiness]

BJS won the fight.

He tired in the second half and Eubank won some rounds but at the end of the day Saunders skill at holding, turning and killing time neutralized most of Eubanks work.

Eubank was outboxed and outsmarted, he knew it as well - ran out the venue with no press conference.