Man does anyone remember me debating a Hatton support about this a few weeks back? I was debating the point that the longer Hatton waits for his "tune-up" fights the worse for him.
My arguement was that due to his between fight lifestyle and fighting style that he has a shorter window of being "prime". Marciano had the style and was out of boxing by 30yrs old, Frazier was shot by around that same age as well. The same can be said of Tyson.
I was of the opinion that since PBF stays in relative good shape and is fanatical about health that he would probably have a longer shelf life. That and the fact that his style allows him to get hit less often than most fighters.
The Hatton supporter was of the opinion that Hatton's regiment was healthier due to Hattons body getting rest and that the constant stress PBF put his body through all year round would add wear and tear quicker than Hattons system of letting go between fights. As proof he stated that Hatton had the best engine in boxing and attributed that to his training only for fights and otherwise resting his body.
My arguement was that due to his between fight lifestyle and fighting style that he has a shorter window of being "prime". Marciano had the style and was out of boxing by 30yrs old, Frazier was shot by around that same age as well. The same can be said of Tyson.
I was of the opinion that since PBF stays in relative good shape and is fanatical about health that he would probably have a longer shelf life. That and the fact that his style allows him to get hit less often than most fighters.
The Hatton supporter was of the opinion that Hatton's regiment was healthier due to Hattons body getting rest and that the constant stress PBF put his body through all year round would add wear and tear quicker than Hattons system of letting go between fights. As proof he stated that Hatton had the best engine in boxing and attributed that to his training only for fights and otherwise resting his body.
Comment