Limeux and Brook vs Postol and Gamboa

[Sheldon312]

Which group looks better on your resume?

[Raonic]

They're both equally good I suppose.

[aldo5408]

Neither both are awful

[Pigeons]

Neither both are awful

What's your beef with Crawford, aldo?

[aldo5408]

What's your beef with Crawford, aldo?

Was disappointed how he said he Manny would have to move down to 140 or no fight. Then he started being disrespectful to Danny Garcia. When Danny beat him at the Olympic trials.
He's higher on the p4p than Danny Garcia despite a worse resume

[Pigeons]

Was disappointed how he said he Manny would have to move down to 140 or no fight. Then he started being disrespectful to Danny Garcia. When Danny beat him at the Olympic trials.
He's higher on the p4p than Danny Garcia despite a worse resume

Crawford was just talking ****. He'd fight at any weight Manny pleases.

You have a point on Garcia though, he's criminally underrated. I think it's because of the Herrera and Peterson fights. While we're at it, so is Adonis Stevenson. If they were with HBO, the media would be all over their ****s.

[Sadiqkingofko]

I like Crawford but as of now Golovkin's resume is better, Crawford is higher P4P on most list because he is lineal champ at two weights

[KingHippo]

Postol is much better than Lemieux. Lemieux would be called garbage and a paper champ by anyone if he wasn't tied to GGG's resume.

Brook is better than Gamboa, but all of this is negated by the fact that Golovkin dragged him from two divisions below. Doubt people would give Crawford any type of credit for beating a super featherweight of Brook's caliber.

[Robbie Barrett]

Postol is much better than Lemieux. Lemieux would be called garbage and a paper champ by anyone if he wasn't tied to GGG's resume.

Brook is better than Gamboa, but all of this is negated by the fact that Golovkin dragged him from two divisions below. Doubt people would give Crawford any type of credit for beating a super featherweight of Brook's caliber.

This.

Postol and Gamboa are better wins.