Originally posted by Bronx2245
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Arum: I Never Discusssed Money for Pacquiao Fight with Crawford
Collapse
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostI was assuming Khan had fought Chino again. Because nothing he did the night I saw him fight Chino was more convincing than either of the fights with Floyd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mbase1235 View PostIt has nothing to do with who I like. And personally I don't think that anyone is objective, we all have our opinions.
But I can see where this is going, you are arguing using emotion, because you don't know what I like or don't like. I simply said that Crawford has a better resume than GGG. I believe that both are great fighters, and I like to watch both of them fight. But a by having a better resume means, this means to me that Crawford has proved he is great more than GGG has, in the ring, where it counts, against a higher level of opponents. I can't just anoint GGG as being the best without him proving it against a high level of competition.
I can't believe that you think that David Lemieux is better than Postol. Lemieux hits hard, but he has fallen apart against average competition, with back-to-back losses against Rubio and Alcine. We cannot say that about Postol. You criticize Postol's victory over Matthysse but that victory is arguably better than any victory of Lemieux's.
And I believe that Gamboa has a better resume than Brook. Brook moved up 2 weight divisions to fight Golovkin and got TKO'd, so no matter how great you think he was a WW, that does not mean much at MW - there are weight divisions for a reason. Some people thought that Brook was the best WW, but he never proved this in the ring. Brook can only be considered one of the best at WW, but certainly not the best, not from just barely beating Shawn Porter, his only notable win. For example, the struggle Brook had with Carson Jones in their first fight does not support him being considered greater than Thurman, who has more notable wins on his resume than Brook.
Yes, the Salido-Lomachenko fight was dirty, but as Ricky Hatton was found of saying, boxing is no tickling contest. And Amir Khan looked like a drunk the way he was stumbling around the ring in the last rounds of his fight with Maidana and barely made it out of that fight, Marcos was knocking Khan all around the ring, and I thought the ref saved Amir from being KO'd. No way did Khan look better than Floyd. I don't even need to answer who is better between Khan and Mayweather.
Bixby Snyder [via mobile]
"How would Andrade fare at 160? Say, against Lemieux?
Dan Rafael, King Fight Freak
"Would beat Lemieux handily IMO. Skills pays the bills, as the old prophet Money Mayweather once said."
Comment
-
We all know that his trainer acts as his manager and speaks for his team everytime. Now that hell broke loose, Crawford suddenly pops up and speaks for himself all of a sudden. His trainer suddenly turns quiet. Funny part here is Arum lies, got infected with political correctness and claims he never discussed money with Crawford's team. Isn't that strange? He never reached out to Crawford as if the Pac fight is nothing? Very very strange.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by victorythagr8 View PostKhan dominated rounds was more one sided than Floyd's. His rounds lost though also more one sided than Floyd's and Khan almost got knocked the **** out in the end.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JoeMan View PostAnother funny part here is the floydhype fanboys are suddenly friends with Arum. It's not about Arum/TR/HBO vs Haymon/PBC/SHO after all. Guess what it is.
So do you think Arum and Crawford are lying, but Roach is telling the truth?
Comment
Comment