What would you rather see

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • M Bison
    Perfect, but you're not
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2012
    • 15677
    • 600
    • 798
    • 32,424

    #1

    What would you rather see

    Out of the two possible options for Manny Pacquiao?

    I'm getting the feeling that for either rumoured opponent that he would be travelling to their location so for me I have to pick Ricky Burns, he has never fought at 147lbs but he has fought good fighters, he's been a world champion took the belt off fairly good opponent in Martinez then another factor is in the UK boxing is way bigger than it is in Australia.
    10
    Ricky Burns
    20.00%
    2
    Jeff Horny
    80.00%
    8
  • Madison Boxing
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 35364
    • 6,455
    • 3,367
    • 190,590

    #2
    Originally posted by Red-Cyclone
    Out of the two possible options for Manny Pacquiao?

    I'm getting the feeling that for either rumoured opponent that he would be travelling to their location so for me I have to pick Ricky Burns, he has never fought at 147lbs but he has fought good fighters, he's been a world champion took the belt off fairly good opponent in Martinez then another factor is in the UK boxing is way bigger than it is in Australia.
    neither tbh, althouigh if i had to pick one it would be horn. Horn is most likely useless and overmatched but hes undefeated, he hasnt hit his ceiling. Ricky burns was a good fighter but we know thats all he is, a good fighter whos struggled and lost to fairly standard opposition. Hes not in the same ball park as manny pacquiao, has no power whatsoever to land a lucky shot either

    Comment

    • M Bison
      Perfect, but you're not
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2012
      • 15677
      • 600
      • 798
      • 32,424

      #3
      Originally posted by bigdramashow
      neither tbh, althouigh if i had to pick one it would be horn. Horn is most likely useless and overmatched but hes undefeated, he hasnt hit his ceiling. Ricky burns was a good fighter but we know thats all he is, a good fighter whos struggled and lost to fairly standard opposition. Hes not in the same ball park as manny pacquiao, has no power whatsoever to land a lucky shot either
      Well true he hasn't hit his so called potential but he hasn't lit the world a fire with what he has been doing so far never heard of the guy until the stories about him fighting Pacquiao.

      I gotta be fair I blasted Ward for wanting to fight some young unknown unheard of Australian kid so I don't respect this fight It'd be better to fight Ricky Burns either at 140 or 147lbs it would be a common opponent that Crawford has fought and If Pacquiao wins it 'marinates' that Crawford Vs. Pacquiao fight especially If Pacquiao is going down to 140lbs to fight him.

      Comment

      • Madison Boxing
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2015
        • 35364
        • 6,455
        • 3,367
        • 190,590

        #4
        Originally posted by Red-Cyclone
        Well true he hasn't hit his so called potential but he hasn't lit the world a fire with what he has been doing so far never heard of the guy until the stories about him fighting Pacquiao.

        I gotta be fair I blasted Ward for wanting to fight some young unknown unheard of Australian kid so I don't respect this fight It'd be better to fight Ricky Burns either at 140 or 147lbs it would be a common opponent that Crawford has fought and If Pacquiao wins it 'marinates' that Crawford Vs. Pacquiao fight especially If Pacquiao is going down to 140lbs to fight him.
        oh yeah by no means am i bigging up horny horn, its a garbage match up.

        Comment

        • boliodogs
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 33358
          • 824
          • 1,782
          • 309,589

          #5
          He should fight Jeff Horn. Pacquiao is the WBO welterweight champion and Horn is ranked 2nd by the WBO and is undefeated with 65% of his wins by KO. Burns has no ranking by the WBO. He has several recent losses including a one sided loss to Crawford and only 30% of his wins are KOs. Why should Pacquiao fight Crawford's recent victim?

          Comment

          • M Bison
            Perfect, but you're not
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2012
            • 15677
            • 600
            • 798
            • 32,424

            #6
            Originally posted by boliodogs
            He should fight Jeff Horn. Pacquiao is the WBO welterweight champion and Horn is ranked 2nd by the WBO and is undefeated with 65% of his wins by KO. Burns has no ranking by the WBO. He has several recent losses including a one sided loss to Crawford and only 30% of his wins are KOs. Why should Pacquiao fight Crawford's recent victim?
            Because the past few wins Burns has is better than anything that Jeff Horn has done?

            Comment

            • HandsofIron
              Super Champion in Recess
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2014
              • 3947
              • 736
              • 765
              • 25,198

              #7
              Jeff Horn and he should come out with 2 Live Crew.

              Comment

              • Larry the boss
                EDUCATED
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 90798
                • 6,419
                • 4,473
                • 2,500,480

                #8
                both are ****

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP