Klitschkos: A decade of dominence

[Elroy The Great]

the win streak and that opp w/l rec (most recent 1st) -
jennings 19-0
kubrat 20-0
leapai 30-4-3
povetkin 26-0
pianeta 28-0-1
wach 27-0
thompson 36-2
mormeck 36-4
haye 25-1
peter 34-3
chambers 35-1
chagaev 25-0-1
rahman 45-6-2
thompson 31-1
ibragimov 22-0-1
brewster 33-3
austin 24-3-4
brock 29-0
byrd 39-2-1
peter 24-0
castillo 18-0-1
williamson 20-2
22-0;16 kos

not a whos who but put another hw streak next to it. i dont see any geezers on the list. the number of no hopers arent overwhelming either. with the hw div, a reigning champ will usually have a ton of bums and geezers on the resume.

[Sadiqkingofko]

the win streak and that opp w/l rec (most recent 1st) -
jennings 19-0
kubrat 20-0
leapai 30-4-3
povetkin 26-0
pianeta 28-0-1
wach 27-0
thompson 36-2
mormeck 36-4
haye 25-1
peter 34-3
chambers 35-1
chagaev 25-0-1
rahman 45-6-2
thompson 31-1
ibragimov 22-0-1
brewster 33-3
austin 24-3-4
brock 29-0
byrd 39-2-1
peter 24-0
castillo 18-0-1
williamson 20-2
22-0;16 kos

not a whos who but put another hw streak next to it. i dont see any geezers on the list. the number of no hopers are overwhelming either. with the hw div, a reigning champ will usually have a ton of bums and geezers on the resume.

tbh I don't see a single bum, there all C-Level or better

[O Prophet]

Vitali was truly dominant, with Wladimir you always got the feeling that he could be KTFO at any time.

[1hourRun]

[Kigali]

I respect tyson fury. The Romany british gypsy. He comes from a lineage of fighting men.

So did the Brothers that whipped Vlad and the one that made Vitali QUIT on his stool

[Kigali]

Vitali was truly dominant, with Wladimir you always got the feeling that he could be KTFO at any time.

Vitali quit on his stool.

[Kigali]

ahahahahah. But to be honest, Corrie sanders wasn't a bum, he was one of the most dangerous south paw heavyweights at the time, and exposes Wlads glass chin, but wlad wasn't yet under Emannuel Stewart.

He was a full time member of the PGA....he didn't even qualify as a bum.

[Elroy The Great]

tbh I don't see a single bum, there all C-Level or better

the ali and holy eras were deep. outside of those, its been slim pickings. i dare a rocky or louis fan to say otherwise.

[Tom Cruise]

the win streak and that opp w/l rec (most recent 1st) -
jennings 19-0
kubrat 20-0
leapai 30-4-3
povetkin 26-0
pianeta 28-0-1
wach 27-0
thompson 36-2
mormeck 36-4
haye 25-1
peter 34-3
chambers 35-1
chagaev 25-0-1
rahman 45-6-2
thompson 31-1
ibragimov 22-0-1
brewster 33-3
austin 24-3-4
brock 29-0
byrd 39-2-1
peter 24-0
castillo 18-0-1
williamson 20-2
22-0;16 kos

not a whos who but put another hw streak next to it. i dont see any geezers on the list. the number of no hopers are overwhelming either. with the hw div, a reigning champ will usually have a ton of bums and geezers on the resume.

How many top wins do all of those guys have put together?

Thats what hurts his resume IMO. The unwilliningness of the majority of his opponents to test themselves vs other top 10 opposition.

Most were happy to wait around for a WK shot, or were chosen before they had a chance to build a resume.

[Elroy The Great]

How many top wins do all of those guys have put together?

Thats what hurts his resume IMO. The unwilliningness of the majority of his opponents to test themselves vs other top 10 opposition.

Most were happy to wait around for a WK shot, or were chosen before they had a chance to build a resume.

as i mentioned before. the history of the hw div hasnt been very deep. fight fans want to louis and rockys eras only because they were written up in a special way. how many 5-17 guys did they fight ?!?!?! how many no hopers and geezers ?!?!?!

iirc, rocky fought 15 guys with less than 10 wins and another 15 guys with more than 20 losses. that 30 wins in the bank. hes just 1 example.