Comments Thread For: Daniel Jacobs Glad Golovkin Fight Didn't Happen December 10
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Its a risky very risky game. Boxers have all the rights to protect their bodies and ensure they are financially well placed post their 40s. The associations like WBO, WBC etc are more to blame for current situation.Comment
-
-
Who says it will even be competitive? What has Jacobs done in his career to prove he will be competitive with GGG besides get KTFO in 5 rds by a fighter who fights a lot like GGG with less power.
Oh wait he ??? KO'ed Quillin whom GGG had doing the bambi in sparring he was nothing but a sparring partner for GGG...Comment
-
And I am a strong believer in that people of German descent last well into thier 30's and with GGG usually fighting 4 times a yr he will be prime for at least 2 more yearsComment
-
I hardly imagine myself coming everyday on a forum to discredit a sportman that I never met in real life.
And this taking in count you're probably an alt and so posting more sht.Comment
-
You're so sensitive and protective of him.Comment
-
who cares ?
fcuk Golovkin's 4 **** fights per year
those who have stated that Golovkin/Jacobs should not be on PPV..... I can't really argue with you, other than.....
I am not a casual fan..... only saw highlights of the Brook fight, and I will never watch Golovkin/Wade..... and yet, I will buy Golovkin/Jacobs
..... so, go figure ?
I have seen TONNES of lower-level/**** fights during my lifetime, not interested in watching supposed stars face over-matched opponents..... I definitely favor Golovkin over Jacobs, but that fight could get interesting.
PPV is only $40 here..... I know it is the principle that counts..... but I wouldn't watch a mismatch for free, and yet I really want to watch Golovkin/Jacobs..... so I have no choice, and I don't really mind too much
I have only ever seen 1 mismatch that I enjoyed.Comment
Comment