Tweet
A lot of ppl are bit&@ing about spence having his mandatory shot at Brook, but funnily enough i havent seen much talk or demand from team spence on enforcing brook to take him on or give up title. Hearn said Spence has a fight lined up at the moment anyway. I think team spence are happy to take fights and get more rounds under his belt whilst awaiting the title shot which he is going to get at one point either way. The guy hasnt fought anyone in the top 10. Algieri hasnt beaten anyone since provodnikov all them years ago, and an old Bundu who went 12 rounds with frankie gavin, whom kell stopped in 6 rounds.
-
-
Bellew is "spot on" with his assessment! I totally agree! Bypass any interim fights, and fight each other before one of y'all gets beat up by someone else! Brook defending his IBF title vs. Spence Jr. is a dumb move! He should be facing Pacquiao, Khan, or BJ Saunders. I think Brook is the favorite in any of those 3 fights! Errol Spence Jr. will ruin Brook's career! As for Khan, his targets should be either Pacquiao or Brook! If you're gonna lose, might as well get paid!Comment
-
there are no big fights out there for either one of them
Absolute nonsense. It's true that Brook/Khan is the biggest fight for both of them but to say there is no big fight's for them is drivel.Comment
-
BROOK vs SPENCE really doesn't make sense for either side. it's a huge risk for each of them and it's not a huge fight yet because spence hasn't had enough time to cement his status yet. the most logical thing for all involved would be brook defending against khan and then vacating to move up to 154. but since this is the IBF, it's going to be difficult to pull that off. the most logical thing for spence is to win the vacant title, make a few defenses and then go into a really tough fight when the economics make sense.Comment
Comment