Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Froch on Golovkin: Time To Step Up in 2017 - Fight Andre Ward!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Scott. Weiland View Post
    So you're enjoying him face mismatch after mismatch or you're just insecure and don't want to see him potentially lose ?
    i am not a GGG fan. i will be rooting for jacobs on march 18.

    GGG is only facing mismatches because of how great he is. he's fighting the best available and because he's so great, they are mismatches.

    insecure about what? i specifically want to see him lose. i hope he loses to jacobs. not sure what you're talking about.

    Comment


    • #92
      This guy Froch can't seem to get GGG out of his mind. Sounds like he has nightmares about this guy!
      Glove up or shut up, as someone else said this guy Froch stayed at 168 and never challenged any where else. That's fine but don't cry about someone else's career moves.

      I think that you'll see GGG make some challenges if he can secure the 160 belts and break Bhop's record. I think he will move up and take the challenge. Time is not on his side and I do think he's in a little decline now but I think this guy will accept the challenges if he can accomplish his goals.

      Ray

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by original zero View Post
        i am not a GGG fan. i will be rooting for jacobs on march 18.

        GGG is only facing mismatches because of how great he is. he's fighting the best available and because he's so great, they are mismatches.

        insecure about what? i specifically want to see him lose. i hope he loses to jacobs. not sure what you're talking about.
        I consider myself a huge GGG fan but have begun to tire of one sided action all in the name of making money, if GGG really wanted to establish himself he'd clear out 168 and then face Ward at a catch weight. I can no longer get excited by the opposition he is facing, too one sided and uncompetitive I like fights where they are considered 50/50's or the opponent at least as a good chance of causing an upset, I can't think of a single GGG opponent at 160 who can cause him any issues.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Scott. Weiland View Post
          I consider myself a huge GGG fan but have begun to tire of one sided action all in the name of making money, if GGG really wanted to establish himself he'd clear out 168 and then face Ward at a catch weight. I can no longer get excited by the opposition he is facing, too one sided and uncompetitive I like fights where they are considered 50/50's or the opponent at least as a good chance of causing an upset, I can't think of a single GGG opponent at 160 who can cause him any issues.
          You're a "huge GGG fan" but you're upset that he's winning his fights convincingly? I don't buy it. The dude easily makes 160, could make 154 if he had to, and you're upset because he's not trying to unify at 168 instead of 160? You've got issues dude.

          The fights are one sided because GGG is an incredible talent. The only WBC/WBA/IBF champion we've had IN ANY DIVISION in *over ten years!!!* Enjoy his greatness while it lasts.

          Why should he let Canelo off the hook? As long as GGG comfortably makes weight, he should break Hopkins' record, destroy Canelo, and add the WBO title if/when possible.

          If you only like 50/50 fights, does that mean Klitschko should have tied a hand behind his back during his dominant reign? Or fought a gorilla?

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            the question.....



            the answer.....




            you had it sussed
            [IMG]http://i.*****.com/3o7TKJIrqxXe8XHEFq.gif[/IMG]

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by original zero View Post
              You're a "huge GGG fan" but you're upset that he's winning his fights convincingly? I don't buy it. The dude easily makes 160, could make 154 if he had to, and you're upset because he's not trying to unify at 168 instead of 160? You've got issues dude.

              The fights are one sided because GGG is an incredible talent. The only WBC/WBA/IBF champion we've had IN ANY DIVISION in *over ten years!!!* Enjoy his greatness while it lasts.

              Why should he let Canelo off the hook? As long as GGG comfortably makes weight, he should break Hopkins' record, destroy Canelo, and add the WBO title if/when possible.

              If you only like 50/50 fights, does that mean Klitschko should have tied a hand behind his back during his dominant reign? Or fought a gorilla?

              you sound like a massive g-tard..... repeating the same silly shht ad nauseum

              they have clearly avoided MUCH better opponents than Golovkin has been facing

              IF Golovkin beats Jacobs, the WBA interim title will be defunct..... it will no longer exist

              FACT: even according to the extremely low standards set by Golovkin fans, if Gennady beats Jacobs he will still not have beaten Hopkins record, and the "title" that he defended for much of that record will no longer exist

              that is a fkn pathetic "achievement", no matter how you spin it..... because not only does it have no substance whatsoever other than Jacobs/Murray, it is not even legitimate

              you " fans " who intend to cheer from the rooftops when that happens, are not boxing fans..... you are strictly Golovkin fans

              Comment


              • #97
                Happy to see him fight Jacobs

                Then want to see him against one of Canelo, Saunders or Jack/Degale winner

                Ward has other business this year

                Comment


                • #98
                  About Time -

                  If the facts were on your side, you'd be able to articulate a cogent argument instead of resorting to name calling.

                  I am not a GGG fan. Just stating facts. I hope he loses his next fight.

                  If my positions were "silly," you'd be able to counter them, but you can't.

                  If Golovkin beats Jacobs, the interim title will still exist. You have no idea what you're talking about.

                  Who are these "MUCH better opponents" GGG has been avoiding? Or do you mean much bigger opponents? What top middleweight has GGG ducked?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Lou Cipher View Post
                    waaaaaaaaaaah



                    still having fun with your stolen gif I see Lou




                    [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/l0MYvXeD9NHc43lw4/*****.gif[/IMG]



                    [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/3o7TKp1NL47p4at04g/*****.gif[/IMG]



                    [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/3o7TKz7q22yTeAOLra/*****.gif[/IMG]



                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Ray Corso View Post
                      This guy Froch can't seem to get GGG out of his mind. Sounds like he has nightmares about this guy!
                      Glove up or shut up, as someone else said this guy Froch stayed at 168 and never challenged any where else. That's fine but don't cry about someone else's career moves.
                      Froch also didn't call out bigger and smaller fighters all day long. He stayed in his lane and did his thing and Froch fought FAR BETTER opposition than Golovkin.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP