Eddie Hearn on Kell Brook and Errol Spence

[RomanReigns]

Lol same people praising canelo for ducking his mandatory and vacating are now ****ting on brook for wanting to fighting khan. Hypocrites.

Spence is better than Khan. And Love to see Spence try to stop Kell Brook.

[Rip Chudd]

IBF needs to strip him if he isn't gonna fight Spence. The mere mention of fighting Wlad in a rematch and they stripped Fury.

[Motorcity Cobra]

Lol same people praising canelo for ducking his mandatory and vacating are now ****ting on brook for wanting to fighting khan. Hypocrites.

I don't have a problem with the Brook-Khan fight. But if that's what Brook wants to do he needs to stop holding onto the belt. It's obvious Hearn doesn't want the fight. He'll negotiate with everyone but Spence. Just give up the belt so the rest of the division can move on

[The Viper]

I don't have a problem with the Brook-Khan fight. But if that's what Brook wants to do he needs to stop holding onto the belt. It's obvious Hearn doesn't want the fight. He'll negotiate with everyone but Spence. Just give up the belt so the rest of the division can move on

This..........period. Kell should just come out and say hey i wanna vacate and fight khan because i'm gonna make wayyyyyyyy more money.....it's business simple as that....

[Rip Chudd]

To be fair he did also say "If we stay at welterweight and we don't fight Amir Khan, then we have to fight Errol Spence"

[Motorcity Cobra]

To be fair he did also say "If we stay at welterweight and we don't fight Amir Khan, then we have to fight Errol Spence"

"If we stay at welterweight" is the key phrase. Eddie wants the Khan fight as Kells next fight. I can see him taking the Cotto fight at 153/2 in the summer then Khan at 147 in the fall/winter. Who else is Cotto going to fight if he aint' getting the Canelo fight?

[Biolink]

Hearn doesn't want the fight. Kell would fight Spence for the right money from Hearn. A loss to Spence would kill the Khan fight and that's the money fight. Spence doesn't care if he fights Kell or Horn as long as he fights for the belt. And luckily the IBF follows their rules and will force the fight or force the vacate

A loss to Spence does not kill the Khan fight IMO. It's been year's in the making, Khan has taken some bad losses and it's still "on". It'll sell just off of the UK people wanting them to get it over with. Like a poverty version of Mayweather-Pacquiao.

[RomanReigns]

Vacate the title. Spence is a better fighter than that Bum Vargas, but he still not yet a world champion.

[al-Xander]

Hearn won't be pushed into making a quick decision especially now that the lucrative Khan fight is on the table. He'll take his time. This is a guy notorious for canceling already negotiated fights without advanced notice. So enjoy your long vacation Spence. Stay sharp bud.

[original zero]

IBF needs to strip him if he isn't gonna fight Spence. The mere mention of fighting Wlad in a rematch and they stripped Fury.

There's more to it than that. When Wlad & Fury fought, the IBF mandatory was already overdue. Since Fury was WBA & WBO mandatory, the IBF allowed an optional defense of their title even though the mandatory was overdue on the condition that the winner would fight the mandatory next.

Wlad & Fury hid their rematch clause from the IBF to trick the IBF into sanctioning their fight.

Brook already fought his mandatory earlier this year. The timeline is nowhere near what it was in the Glazkov situation.