Comments Thread For: Manager: Jarrell Miller Willing to Challenge Parker in New Zealand

[Sid-Knee]

You only make a fool of yourself.

Sure thing Scott.

[KillaCamNZ]

So Brezeale, Whyte and Martin are bums but Ruiz is good? Ruiz is a fat slob. Takam is quite honestly the most overrated heavy out there. The only reason you say they're good wins is down to Parker struggling while AJ was dominating his opponents. That's the only reason.

We don't know much about Martin or Brezeale. they're both still young. They still have time to prove themselves. They could end up being good fighters or just decent.

But what I can tell you is that whyte has a win over Chisora and Brezeale has a win over Mansour, two wins that are better than anything Ruiz or Takem have. And that's a fact. You're just being deliriously biased.

Most of your posts are about this topic which shows me clearly that you're pissed that Parker looks like crap and AJ looks the business. So you're throwing catty remarks around like a child.

Last time we had this conversation you were calling AJ's opponents fat. But now that Parker has fought Ruiz (the fattest heavy out there) you're calling him good. You really couldn't make this up.

Hang on, hang on. Whyte-Chisora was a good ****ing fight, I liked that. But you do realize that Breazeale beat Mansour because Mansour bit his own tongue so hard he had to retire, right? Breazeale lost every round of that fight including being knocked down. He was literally being swept.

Charles Martin's best win was getting outboxed until his opponent fell over himself and tore his knee up, giving him a title that he eventually sold to Hearn and Joshua.

You have an incredibly selective memory (and an inability to bring up examples of your claims). I have praised AJ many, many times and will continue to do so, because he's an elite heavyweight fighter. I've been critical of his resume, and I've provided my best analysis on what I see of him. Likewise, I've been open and critical of what Parker does wrong.

I don't do catty comments - but I will suggest you pull a Mansour and bite your own tongue before you keep making claims without substance.

I seriously had no idea TKO via self-mutilation was worth referring to in a positive manner.

[Sid-Knee]

Hang on, hang on. Whyte-Chisora was a good ****ing fight, I liked that. But you do realize that Breazeale beat Mansour because Mansour bit his own tongue so hard he had to retire, right? Breazeale lost every round of that fight including being knocked down. He was literally being swept.

Charles Martin's best win was getting outboxed until his opponent fell over himself and tore his knee up, giving him a title that he eventually sold to Hearn and Joshua.

You have an incredibly selective memory (and an inability to bring up examples of your claims). I have praised AJ many, many times and will continue to do so, because he's an elite heavyweight fighter. I've been critical of his resume, and I've provided my best analysis on what I see of him. Likewise, I've been open and critical of what Parker does wrong.

I don't do catty comments - but I will suggest you pull a Mansour and bite your own tongue before you keep making claims without substance.

I seriously had no idea TKO via self-mutilation was worth referring to in a positive manner.

You do know that a punch is what caused Mansour's injury? And that he was exhausted before he quit and was ready to go? Mansour just didn't want to get taken out. He knew if he came out for the next round it was over for him. It's still a legit win for Brezeale that's better than what Ruiz and Takem have. No matter which way you want to slice it, that's just the honest truth.

At least you accept Whyte has a better win than anything Ruiz and Takem have.

Whereas with Martin, we just don't know how good he is. You simply can't judge him by the AJ loss. AJ is just that good. He'd do the same if not worse to Parker. Would you then come back and say Parker was **** due to how dominating the win was? Of course not. But that's what you're doing now with Martin.

Oh and Martin wasn't getting out-boxed before the injury came about, that's just your inability to score a fight properly. Go and watch now on YouTube to see if you think that.

I consider Takem, Ruiz, Whyte, Brezeale and Martin to be on the same level until proven otherwise. To consider anything else is pure bias. It's as simple as that.

[KillaCamNZ]

You do know that a punch is what caused Mansour's injury? And that he was exhausted before he quit and was ready to go? Mansour just didn't want to get taken out. He knew if he came out for the next round it was over for him. It's still a legit win for Brezeale that's better than what Ruiz and Takem have. No matter which way you want to slice it, that's just the honest truth.

At least you accept Whyte has a better win than anything Ruiz and Takem have.

Whereas with Martin, we just don't know how good he is. You simply can't judge him by the AJ loss. AJ is just that good. He'd do the same if not worse to Parker. Would you then come back and say Parker was **** due to how dominating the win was? Of course not. But that's what you're doing now with Martin.

Oh and Martin wasn't getting out-boxed before the injury came about, that's just your inability to score a fight properly. Go and watch now on YouTube to see if you think that.

I consider Takem, Ruiz, Whyte, Brezeale and Martin to be on the same level until proven otherwise. To consider anything else is pure bias. It's as simple as that.

A few things:

What part of he was losing every round against Mansour, do you not understand?

Secondly, I never said anything about Whyte having a better win than Takam or Ruiz. Which confirms to me that you have incredibly selective reading, and when there's a blank, you make things up in your head and pretend they are real.

Third, that's wonderful that you consider Takam, Ruiz, Whyte and Breazeale to be on the same level. But your comment about "anything else is pure bias" is ridiculous. That's narrow minded, and you need to accept that people are going to have different opinions to you every now and then. What you say is not the be all and end all - I encourage you to be strong in your opinion, but I don't encourage you to be ignorant. This place does not need more ignorance, so don't be one of the sheep.

You clearly know a thing or two about boxing, that's great. Embrace diversity though. There's a reason why UK fans are replacing US fans as the go-to when people think of ignorance - it's not good.

I'll end this by saying - I think AJ being considered the #1 Heavyweight boxing is reasonably fair. It's up for debate, but I'm not going to rip apart anyone who thinks that is the case. His physical tools, and the way he has dominated his opponents (albeit ones that are arguably B level) is incredible. I also believe he needs to prove he's worthy of the top spot.

[Earl-Hickey]

Hang on, hang on. Whyte-Chisora was a good ****ing fight, I liked that. But you do realize that Breazeale beat Mansour because Mansour bit his own tongue so hard he had to retire, right? Breazeale lost every round of that fight including being knocked down. He was literally being swept.

Charles Martin's best win was getting outboxed until his opponent fell over himself and tore his knee up, giving him a title that he eventually sold to Hearn and Joshua.

You have an incredibly selective memory (and an inability to bring up examples of your claims). I have praised AJ many, many times and will continue to do so, because he's an elite heavyweight fighter. I've been critical of his resume, and I've provided my best analysis on what I see of him. Likewise, I've been open and critical of what Parker does wrong.

I don't do catty comments - but I will suggest you pull a Mansour and bite your own tongue before you keep making claims without substance.

I seriously had no idea TKO via self-mutilation was worth referring to in a positive manner.

Charles Martin was out boxing glazkov not the other way round

If you are going to hate at least check your facts first

[keith_head]

Takam and Ruiz are better than Brezeale and Martin. You may have your opinions but I doubt many people would disagree with that statement.

[keith_head]

Charles Martin was out boxing glazkov not the other way round

If you are going to hate at least check your facts first

Neither guy was winning, nothing happened in that fight until Glazkov slipped. Could've been 2-0, 1-1 or 0-2 at that time, no one had done anything noteworthy.

[Earl-Hickey]

Neither guy was winning, nothing happened in that fight until Glazkov slipped. Could've been 2-0, 1-1 or 0-2 at that time, no one had done anything noteworthy.

Martin was making glazkov miss and landing himself.

It was 2-0 Martin and he already had glazkov timed.

But of course we have to give Joshua's resume no credit so let's not admit that.

[KillaCamNZ]

Charles Martin was out boxing glazkov not the other way round

If you are going to hate at least check your facts first

A lot of people saw the fight in different ways. If I remember right, one judge had it a draw, one had Martin ahead, the other Glazkov. Pretty subjective.

The rest I said, stands. I'm still cracking up about the Mansour - Breazeale chatter.

[keith_head]

Martin was making glazkov miss and landing himself.

It was 2-0 Martin and he already had glazkov timed.

But of course we have to give Joshua's resume no credit so let's not admit that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IBAmwG3ff0&t=1118s

If you're watching that fight and saying that Martin was dominating Glaskov before the first slip, you're seeing something different to me.

Maybe Martin would have won, maybe not. I personally am not going to give him credit for an ACL injury.