Comments Thread For: Joshua-Klitschko Mandatories: Winner Could Lose A Belt

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • asgarth
    Moderator
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 3180
    • 268
    • 144
    • 36,835
    #11
    man these ******s should just establish a mandatory together and enforce a final elimanator between Pulev and Ortiz.

    It is ridiculous that its possible to lose a belt, because you have to deal with 2 mandatories at the same time.

      Comment

      • Randall Cunning
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2015
        • 6041
        • 163
        • 30
        • 84,599
        #12
        It wont come to it, someone explained it in a post much better than I will now yesterday. Joshua will fight Pulev next. A deal will be worked out with Ortiz (same promoters) to fight after Pulev.

        Klitschko wins who knows. Does he retire? Can he take a retirement fight against Parker in the Summer and regain all his belts. Parkers trying to shop his belt around. Unifications trump mandatories?

          Comment

          • MrRolltide91
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Aug 2010
            • 12208
            • 167
            • 1
            • 30,631
            #13
            Smh........

              Comment

              Previous 1 2 template Next
              Working...
              TOP

              Sign In

              Forgot password?

              Register

              Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
              JOIN NOW