The Big 3 Resume's As World Class Fighters

[Sadiqkingofko]

let me clarify who the big 3 is, it's Canelo, Golovkin, and Jermall Charlo. Both Canelo and Jermall said they're going to fight at 160 in 2017 so I consider them the big 3 and if they fight each other I think all 3 will get at least one L

Canelo- AVG (B+)

L. Smith - C-Level Fighter
A. Khan - A-Level Fighter (moving up 8 pounds)
M. Cotto - A-Level Fighter
J. Kirkland - C-Level Fighter
E. Lara - A-Level Fighter
A. Angulo - D-Level Fighter
F. Mayweather - ATG-Level Fighter (lost)
A. Trout - A-Level Fighter

Golovkin- AVG (C+)

K. Brook - A-Level Fighter (moving up 13 pounds)
D. Wade - C-Level Fighter (maybe even D)
D. Lemiuex - B-Level Fighter
W. Monroe - B-Level Fighter
M. Murray - B-Level Fighter
M. Rubio - C-Level Fighter
D. Geale - B-Level Fighter
O. Adama - D-Level Fighter
C. Stevens - C-Level Fighter
M. Macklin - C-Level Fighter
N. Ishida - D-Level Fighter
G. Rosado - C-Level Fighter

Charlo- AVG (B)
J. Williams - B-Level Fighter
A. Trout - A-Level Fighter
W. Campfort - D-Level Fighter
C. Bundarge - B-Level Fighter

[Dr Rumack]

The A/B/C thing is a useless way to categorise fighters. You need to go to the trouble of looking up their rankings at the time of the fights if you want to do something like this. Otherwise don't waste your time.

[BM dnobagaV]

Think of quantity vs. quality.
Quantity, Golovkin has a great resume.
Quality, he has a horrendous resume.

Canelo is a mix of both. Which is how it should be.

[Pain~Lucy]

dumbest analogy i've seen

[Idunnoshet]

Oh oh . Get ready for the Hate in 3 , 2 , 1 ...

[Sadiqkingofko]

dumbest analogy i've seen

how?? all three have solid resumes, at the moment Canelo's resume is the best but that could change if these three fight each other

[j0zef]

Saw Amir Khan as an A-Level fighter and stopped reading.

[boliodogs]

Your 700th GGG hate thread. You must think your opinion is extremely accurate, correct and important because you start many threads daily forcing your opinion on this board. Your goal seems to be convincing everyone that GGG is not very good and doesn't deserve a PFP top 10 ranking. The A B C and D rating system you use is silly and a poor way to rate fighters. Their ranking at the time of the fight is the way it should be done as Dr Rumack said. You consider yourself the PFP policeman and decider and give yourself the final word on who belongs on that list and where they should be on that list. GGG is in the top 5 pound for pound on every list except yours. Jermall has never been on any PFP list except yours. Jermall shouldn't even be in the PFP race yet. Your ranking of the opponents is often wrong in my opinion. At this point in time Trout isn't a better fighter than Lemieux in my opinion. I think Lemieux would KO Trout if they fought each other.

[boliodogs]

Oh oh . Get ready for the Hate in 3 , 2 , 1 ...

It's a ****** thread that deserves all the hate it gets. Do you agree with him that Jermall is the 2nd best pound for pound boxer in the world? Does anybody on here think Jermall is the 2nd best PFP guy yet except the thread starter?

[gmc_rfc_06]

Khan wasn't A level for Canelo.

Trout was no longer A level for Charlo.