Hatton landed more punches

[moochi]

Exactly, and compubox is done by humans, so there should be allowances for human error. Collazo won by a pt or two atleast, and being the champ fully deserved the win.

man, first of all, since when are people that dumb to go of these stats.........even if they were true, HELLO HELLO, boxing is scored on a round per round basis.............so even if these stats were true, it doesn't mean these so-called punches were spread out evenly throughout the rounds...............

[2OSouzaSuarez12]

The Compubox stats from the fight:

Total punches thrown:

Collazo (712)
Hatton (741)

Total punches connected:

Collazo (213)
Hatton (259)

Connection Percentage:

Collazo (30%)
Hatton (35%)

The fight was close, but the judges made the right decision.

And this matters why? Collazo landed the much more affective and cleaner blows all night.

[armani_model]

Round 12 Hatton got owned!!!! But apart from that most rounds were Hatton didnt really look hurt from Collazo's punches.

[Hous]

Hatton won more rounds, got a KD in round one, and still some people want to give the fight to Collazo, morons.

Hatton won that fight on all stats.

This is funny because the main arguement after the fight was Hatton was not connecting punches, proven wrong he connected more with a higher percentage. And that Hatton kept clenching the entire fight, if you watch the video Collazo initiated almost all of the clinches up til round 10. Hatton had the fight won, instead of running like DLH did to Trinidad he clinched, it worked.

End of story, noone has any evidence that Collazo deserved the win or even a draw. Hatton fought in a different country, a different weight, a aweful matchup and still whooped Collazos ass. Not dominated but he won.

Hatto was losing round 12 bad but he was winning at the end with that HUGE left. Collazo was winning up til 1 minute left so you cant even say the Collazo would have knocked him out, Hatton was winning at the end of round 12, but not enough to take the round.

And this matters why? Collazo landed the much more affective and cleaner blows all night.

Obviously he didn't. Yeah math is totally biased to brits!

man, first of all, since when are people that dumb to go of these stats.........even if they were true, HELLO HELLO, boxing is scored on a round per round basis.............so even if these stats were true, it doesn't mean these so-called punches were spread out evenly throughout the rounds...............

Thank you for owning yourself. Thats exactly correct and it was clear Hatton won more rounds, the first by 10-8. You guys just keep owning yourselves I swear. First Collazo connected more, then when the stats come out connecting means nothing because Hatton won. Then you admit Hatton won more rounds but not big enough to win, LMAO! What you give Hatton round one by 10-9 with his KD, but give Collazo round 12 by 10-8 without a KD and losing at the end of the round? Thats the only way you can even get a draw from this fight.

The more you type the smarter you make Hatton fans look.

Thank you. This is almost as good as Manny P hosting the video which clearly showed Hatton winning, but claiming otherwise. Note after that video was posted more people went to vote on the outcome of the fight and Hatton jumped 10%.

Again I thank you all.

[Manny_P]

Hatton won more rounds, got a KD in round one, and still some people want to give the fight to Collazo, morons.

Hatton won that fight on all stats.

This is funny because the main arguement after the fight was Hatton was not connecting punches, proven wrong he connected more with a higher percentage. And that Hatton kept clenching the entire fight, if you watch the video Collazo initiated almost all of the clinches up til round 10. Hatton had the fight won, instead of running like DLH did to Trinidad he clinched, it worked.

End of story, noone has any evidence that Collazo deserved the win or even a draw. Hatton fought in a different country, a different weight, a aweful matchup and still whooped Collazos ass. Not dominated but he won.

Hatto was losing round 12 bad but he was winning at the end with that HUGE left. Collazo was winning up til 1 minute left so you cant even say the Collazo would have knocked him out, Hatton was winning at the end of round 12, but not enough to take the round.



Obviously he didn't. Yeah math is totally biased to brits!

This guy is really ****** eh? Just give him bad K if silly posts like this annoys you.

[2OSouzaSuarez12]

Obviously he didn't. Yeah math is totally biased to brits!

Math doesnt show how hard the punches were. Collazo's punches were harder and more effecticve. Compubox cant show that.

[Easy-E]

yes they did. it was a very close fight but hatton won.

The compubox stats can be good evidence when the numbers arnt close, but when the numbers are close like this, they arnt enough evidence to concretly say who was the winner. In addition to this, Collozo could have outlanded Hatton and still won the fight.

[Manny_P]

Math doesnt show how hard the punches were. Collazo's punches were harder and more aeffecticve. Compubox cant show that.

Hoes doesn't know that. He thinks Compubox stats declares victory.

[Easy-E]

Math doesnt show how hard the punches were. Collazo's punches were harder and more aeffecticve. Compubox cant show that.

Collozo won rounds convincingly. Hatton won the majoirty of the rounds, but not in the fashion collazo did.

[2OSouzaSuarez12]

Hous i jus gace you good karma do help you get over the fact you know Hatton lost. Not much but i hope it helps, just trying to help you out.
Get better.