this is why the MYTH of Mayweather keeps growing

[Straw18]

i guess when you're p4p fighter you don't have to fight anybody that doesn't always look great,

it seems like mayweathers fans and or, the boxing public is buliding or i should say giving credit to mayweather without mayweather even being in the ring with the other big name fighters, i think it is funny and ludacris that mayweather is looked as such an invinsiable caliber fighter, when in my opinon he is showing signs of slowing down and hasn't fought any tough opponets since castillo

Do you have any big names in mind, or just a blanket approach? I find it hard to believe some big name fighter hasn't hired you yet for your uncanny ability to watch tapes in slow motion and point out the opportune time to hit PBF.

"take a look at those fights again, look at mayweather shoulders, look where his defence is and when he brings up his guard, study those fight and look for errors, where would you punch floyd in retaliation to his punchs thrown or him having his guard, like i said study those fights, i can't explaining to good what i see, but i know in my opinon floyd is showing signs of slowing down, and as i mentioned before it could be that he is too inactive, he may need to fight more to keep his skills sharp"


Sheer brilliance.

[ferocity]

Do you have any big names in mind, or just a blanket approach? I find it hard to believe some big name fighter hasn't hired you yet for your uncanny ability to watch tapes in slow motion and point out the opportune time to hit PBF.

"take a look at those fights again, look at mayweather shoulders, look where his defence is and when he brings up his guard, study those fight and look for errors, where would you punch floyd in retaliation to his punchs thrown or him having his guard, like i said study those fights, i can't explaining to good what i see, but i know in my opinon floyd is showing signs of slowing down, and as i mentioned before it could be that he is too inactive, he may need to fight more to keep his skills sharp"


Sheer brilliance.

let me ask you what makes floyd a p4p fight his skills or his quality of opponets?

he can fight, margarito, hatton, then if he pass's by these guys by then cotto and castillo or corrales whomever wins deserves a rematch.

im sure you hold a light to floyd don't you?

you act as if floyd has no flaws, just take a look at what judah was able to do to him, that fight was close, your boy is slipping

and don't worry im not taking your job, you keep on training your fighters, my opinions shouldn't scare you

[Easy-E]

but i think taylor looked better beating hopkins then tarver beating glenn

Ya but what about vs roy?
Career accomplishments need to count for something.

Hows this.
Ill break it down like the ring breaks it down, number of wins over championship opponents. I forget the exact numbers, but i know Floyd has 8 wins, winky has 3 wins, taylor has 2 wins and MAB is first with 11.
Floyd is second. To me, thats a pretty good indicatior of p4p standings.

[ferocity]

Ya but what about vs roy?
Career accomplishments need to count for something.

Hows this.
Ill break it down like the ring breaks it down, number of wins over championship opponents. I forget the exact numbers, but i know Floyd has 8 wins, winky has 3 wins, taylor has 2 wins and MAB is first with 11.
Floyd is second. To me, thats a pretty good indicatior of p4p standings.

so then barrera is p4p #1 is that what you're saying

[Easy-E]

so then barrera is p4p #1 is that what you're saying

No, not necessarily. Like we talked about, its your recent wins, your recent losses, and the type of wins you have. See, barrera has looked unimpressive in his past few fights, the loss to pac and the bad showing against peden. Floyd however has a quality win over zab, and ko win over mitchell, whos a decent opponent, and a great win over gatti. Add those recent wins, with the type of domination he has displayed, as well as the fact he has beaten many championship fighers WHILE moving up in weight, he deserves the number one spot.
Thats how i calculated it.

[ferocity]

No, not necessarily. Like we talked about, its your recent wins, your recent losses, and the type of wins you have. See, barrera has looked unimpressive in his past few fights, the loss to pac and the bad showing against peden. Floyd however has a quality win over zab, and ko win over mitchell, whos a decent opponent, and a great win over gatti. Add those recent wins, with the type of domination he has displayed, as well as the fact he has beaten many championship fighers WHILE moving up in weight, he deserves the number one spot.
Thats how i calculated it.

i don't hold too much weight in those wins, though floyd looked good....but judah having lost his last fight then the judah fight doesn't count much cause then i can say, baldomier had judah in worst trouble, but in this fight judah was the one who looked better coming off his loss to baldomier, the mitchell fight is where i started noticing floyds flaws i thought it was do to inactivity but i saw it against judah

so i belive taylor win is more worthy then judah, mitchel or gatti, mayweather could have fought margarito or hatton and i'd have no problem with him being #1

im not saying floyd is not skilled he is highly skilled but like all great warriors their comes a time when they slowly start to show signs of slowing down, in this instance in my opinion it could be do to floyds inactivity

[mayweather]

pound for pound means the fighter would be just as good at a higher or lower weight then they are at. jermain taylor, has been a middle weight for a long ass time. i dont know why he gets a p4p ranking

[ferocity]

pound for pound means the fighter would be just as good at a higher or lower weight then they are at. jermain taylor, has been a middle weight for a long ass time. i dont know why he gets a p4p ranking

in p4p discussion that im aware of, it doesn't matter how long you've been at one weight - you can still be considered in the top 10, but you're right, p4p is basicly "the fighter would be just as good at a higher or lower weight then they are at"

[oliverlt]

in p4p discussion that im aware of, it doesn't matter how long you've been at one weight - you can still be considered in the top 10, but you're right, p4p is basicly "the fighter would be just as good at a higher or lower weight then they are at"

yeah that the way it is.

[bdevils]

i guess when you're p4p fighter you don't have to fight anybody that doesn't always look great,

it seems like mayweathers fans and or, the boxing public is buliding or i should say giving credit to mayweather without mayweather even being in the ring with the other big name fighters, i think it is funny and ludacris that mayweather is looked as such an invinsiable caliber fighter, when in my opinon he is showing signs of slowing down and hasn't fought any tough opponets since castillo

how many of these ****ing threads are you going to make. we all know you are a floyd hater so no need to keep running your mouth about why floyd isn't p4p. true boxing fans know.