Callazo/Hatton - Who won the fight??

[machotime]

He was graceful because he knew he lost. He SAID in the interview that he lost, but that Hatton didnt do enough to take the title. Hatton won clearly, even he knew that.

Hatton won beacuase of his holding and hitting not because of talent or boxing ability.

Collazo is a better fighter than Hatton, Hatton is overrated and was hyped by guys like you.

HATTON= OVERRATED

[GunStar]

No he is exactly right, I dont care for either, I bet for Hatton so i was a bit biased but I would have enjoyed seeing him being beat as well. I know how to judge fights and I also dont see how anyone could possibly get a score thats not for Hatton by 1 or 2 points. I dont see Hatton by three unless you gave round ten 10 to Hatton but I didnt.

I had the fight even after 11 rounds. Cola won the 12th round clearly, he had Hatton hurt pretty badly. That's why I scored it for Cola by 1 point, I didn't score the last round 10-8, but I have no problem if someone did.

[DiegoFuego]

I must say, it's becoming more and more clear whose opinion is to be taken seriously when it comes to deciding who really wins fights that go to the cards. If you scored this fight for Collazo, I seriously doubt your ability to score fights and honestly don't think I can take you seriously. It's like scoring the fight a couple weeks ago for Raheem. There is just no way you can come up with some of the scorecards you guys are coming up with. It's really pathetic also how everyone tries to call robbery in a close fight that Hatton won by about 3 points. How the hell is that a robbery? A robbery is Holyfield-Lewis I, when one guy wins 8-9 rounds and LOSES on the cards. If Collazo won 7 rounds, then I need to get my ****ing eyes checked and I just had that done last week. Give me a break with this bull**** already.

[mECHsLAVE]

I had the fight even after 11 rounds. Cola won the 12th round clearly, he had Hatton hurt pretty badly. That's why I scored it for Cola by 1 point, I didn't score the last round 10-8, but I have no problem if someone did.

That would be completely asinine if they did.

[DiegoFuego]

Hatton won beacuase of his holding and hitting not because of talent or boxing ability.

Collazo is a better fighter than Hatton, Hatton is overrated and was hyped by guys like you.

HATTON= OVERRATED

Hatton doesn't hold and hit. He hits the opponent, grabs them, releases and smacks them again. It is perfectly legal, and Collazo was a ***** for complaining. I'm serious when I say there's no legal way to stop Hatton from bringing the pain and that's why he's so dangerous. I think Mayweather is the only guy who can take him from 147 on down.

[Violent Demise]

Dudes, I just saw in another thread that Bozo scored it 7-5 for Hatton.

The end. Your ship is sunk.

If the most-biased foreign, white fighter hater on this board scored it for Hatton, then you know he won.

Bozo has always been a ****in moran. His opinion stopped meaning anything a long time ago

[GunStar]

I must say, it's becoming more and more clear whose opinion is to be taken seriously when it comes to deciding who really wins fights that go to the cards. If you scored this fight for Collazo, I seriously doubt your ability to score fights and honestly don't think I can take you seriously.

I don't agree with this, it was a close fight & I don't agree for anyone to think either fighter won clearly.

It was a close fight, but Hatton was in serious trouble in the last round, if this fight lasted one more round, Cola might of knocked Hatton out.

I think it's ****** for anyone to say that Hatton or Cola won clearly. I can see Hatton fans scoring it for Hatton by 1 point & I can see the unbiased fans score it for Cola by 1 point.

Fact is no one knows who the **** Cola is or was, so I highly doubt anyone was rooting Cola. I wanted Hatton to win, but I thought he lost by 1 point, which I think is a fair score.

[DiegoFuego]

Yeah, Collazo almost did knock him out, but he didn't, and that's why he lost the fight. Nobody can show me 7 rounds Collazo won, and he needed 7

[mECHsLAVE]

Bozo has always been a ****in moran. His opinion stopped meaning anything a long time ago

Not to get too deep here or anything, but Bozo actually is not a moron. He knows boxing. His problem is that he's just completely biased. You can see he doesn't even believe what he's typing half the time, and working his ass off to spin falsehoods into reality. But it's all because he's biased- against foreign, white fighters. His track record is proven.

So if HE scored the fight for Hatton, then that's that. Even this little "COLLAZO WAS ROBBED" crowd should be able to see they are simply spinning their wheels. Scoring the rounds EVEN is giving Collazo every conceivable benefit of the doubt, which leaves Hatton a 1 point winner.

[Bozo_no no]

Not to get too deep here or anything, but Bozo actually is not a moron. He knows boxing. His problem is that he's just completely biased. You can see he doesn't even believe what he's typing half the time, and working his ass off to spin falsehoods into reality. But it's all because he's biased- against foreign, white fighters. His track record is proven.

No, your problem is you (like your band of clownish brothers) hang off the nuts of white foreign fighters, and will go to great lengths to defend them in the face of even the slightest critisism.

You're the one who writes 500 word spin jobs every time I confront YOUR biased drivel.