Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

is GGG's height really 5'10 1/2?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post

    Golovkin's shoes are thicker than Kovalev. Boxing shoes are like valet shoes.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by RomanReigns View Post
      Golovkin's shoes are thicker than Kovalev. Boxing shoes are like valet shoes.
      Golovkin is hunching his back more.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by RomanReigns View Post
        Golovkin's shoes are thicker than Kovalev. Boxing shoes are like valet shoes.
        Brock Lesnar whooped your Boy at Wrestlemaina 31 boy.

        "They, they thought Roman Reigns would be the one. But, but, they would always remember Wrestlemania 31."

        Comment


        • #14
          Found another. Golovkin leaning in and he's still almost as tall.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
            Found another. Golovkin leaning in and he's still almost as tall.
            I would probably think he isn't the "Small Middleweight." that most my compatriots are making him out to be. I'm a Golovkin big time but, I know he is either the "Medium sized Middleweight - Bigger Middleweight" range, and would probably has the range and height to compete at 168 pounders no problem.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
              Golovkin is hunching his back more.
              With legit 5'10" Mike Tyson, and 5'10" Matt Damon



              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
                I would probably think he isn't the "Small Middleweight." that most my compatriots are making him out to be. I'm a Golovkin big time but, I know he is either the "Medium sized Middleweight - Bigger Middleweight" range, and would probably has the range and height to compete at 168 pounders no problem.
                I've never used to think of him as being a big or small MW but when I've seen him on the scales the last couple times, it's clear that he's not a small MW. His frame is big and it's hard to imagine him doing anything below 160.

                I've been very confident in the idea that he could storm 168 and take shyt over. He's not going to be disadvantaged in size as some people seem to think.

                That said, I don't think he's necessarily a huge MW either.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by RomanReigns View Post
                  With legit 5'10" Mike Tyson, and 5'10" Matt Damon





                  Atleast post pics where you can see their feet.

                  Here he is with a 5'9 and half Hagler.

                  These kind of pics are useless.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    He's actually 6'3

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
                      Atleast post pics where you can see their feet.

                      Here he is with a 5'9 and half Hagler.

                      These kind of pics are useless.

                      Holy hell does GGG looked like a cruiserweight next to Hagler.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP