Well, Santa Cruz was 'more proven' than Postol but I believe Postol is the more skilled of the two. I'll say Postol but if someone said Santa Cruz I wouldn't argue against it.
Dan Rafael wrote an article on Fighter of the Year today and he surmised that Crawford, Frampton, and Lomachenko are the front runners for Fighter of the Year (http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/i...-molina-boxing).
All 3 have a great #1 win, I like Crawford's the most, but it's close. Frampton and Lomachenko's #2 wins are vastly superior to Crawford's (Frampton: undefeated Quigg in unification; Lomachenko: Martinez moving up for a 2nd weight class title), but Crawford gets the edge in activity as he's getting a 3rd fight in this year.
Dan Rafael wrote an article on Fighter of the Year today and he surmised that Crawford, Frampton, and Lomachenko are the front runners for Fighter of the Year (http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/i...-molina-boxing).
All 3 have a great #1 win, I like Crawford's the most, but it's close. Frampton and Lomachenko's #2 wins are vastly superior to Crawford's (Frampton: undefeated Quigg in unification; Lomachenko: Martinez moving up for a 2nd weight class title), but Crawford gets the edge in activity as he's getting a 3rd fight in this year.
It will be an interesting race.
It's between Frampton and Crawford for me. Frampton has arguably the best win and by far the second best win: unbeaten B-level Quigg. Rocky is C-level and barely better than Lundy and Molina. Crawford is having a good year again with one more win than the others, assuming he wins this saturday, and also the best single win as far as I am concerned.
Comment