It could have gone either way

[M Bison]

The famous line of someone in denial but anyway It wasn't a robbery because the judges scored it close, here's some examples that prove my point:

Felix Sturm Vs. Chudinov II
Judge: Jean-Louis Legland 115-113
Judge: Giuseppe Quartarone 115-113
Judge: Ignacio Robles 114-114

JCC Sr Vs. Whitaker
Judge: Jack Woodruff 115-113
Judge: Mickey Vann 115-115
Judge: Franz Marti 115-115

Pacquiao Vs. Bradley I
Judge: Duane Ford 115-113
Judge: C.J. Ross 115-113
Judge: Jerry Roth 113-115

Ricky Burns Vs. Raymundo Beltran
Judge: Carlos Ortiz Jr 115-112
Judge: Richard James Davies 114-114
Judge: Andre Van Grootenbruel 113-115

Carl Froch Vs. Andre Dirrell
Judge: Alejandro Rochin 113-114
Judge: Massimo Barrovecchio 115-112
Judge: Daniel Van de Wiele 115-112

Canelo Alvarez Vs. Erislandy Lara
Judge: Dave Moretti 115-113
Judge: Levi Martinez 117-111
Judge: Jerry Roth 113-115

Sergey Kovalev Vs. Andre Ward
Judge: Burt A. Clements 114-113
Judge: Glenn Trowbridge 114-113
Judge: John McKaie 114-113

So as you can quite clearly see it's blatantly obvious that the judges know better than all of you and you can now longer argue any of these 'robberies' because robberies don't happen when the judges only had it by 2-3 points.

[daggum]

sven ottke's career could have went either way. could have been undefeated or lost every single fight. jut got lucky 35 time in a row

[Thraxox]

When you respond with facts and logic, they will reply with "You don't know anything about boxing." Or my favorite line "X Fighter nut hugger." Usually its the Flmos that do this.

[bambam182]

sven ottke's career could have went either way. could have been undefeated or lost every single fight. jut got lucky 35 time in a row

ROFL. this made me laugh out loud literally lol. green given.

[bambam182]

When you respond with facts and logic, they will reply with "You don't know anything about boxing." Or my favorite line "X Fighter nut hugger." Usually its the Flmos that do this.

the pac-tards are the only ones who consider pac still undefeated.

they say he lost early cause he was malnourished. robbed against bradley. didnt have punchers gloves against morales. JMM was on roids, mayweather was on roids.

pac-tards still think pac is undefeated HAHAHAHA.

thats why pac-tards are the ****tiest fan base off all time of any fighter. the GGGoons are not far behind though.

[BrometheusBob.]

sven ottke's career could have went either way. could have been undefeated or lost every single fight. jut got lucky 35 time in a row

[BrometheusBob.]

Yeah, we're not saying it's not a robbery only because of the judges scorecards. You get that right?

[M Bison]

Yeah, we're not saying it's not a robbery only because of the judges scorecards. You get that right?

"There was only a few points in it couldn't have been a robbery, judges know better look at all these professional boxers that thought Ward won it"