the stink coming off slappin' soggy is intolerable
Comments Thread For: Ryabinsky: I Would Be Ashamed if I Was Andre Ward!
Collapse
-
-
Grabbing and grappling is just another way of saying held or clinched. So again, Kovalev held and head locked Ward to prevent being grabbed or held?The judges handed out a major freebie to Ward. Merry early Christmas. But really, the crappy judges didn't do him any favors. Crappy decisions aren't good for anyone. They leave a stank on the "winner" unless he delivers a timely rematch. And as I mention above, Ward is looking to wriggle out of a rematch.
You say you don't expect him to act like he lost, but bemoan him acting like he won. There is no in between. You want him to act as if there was a "crappy decision". You want him to act as if he lost so that it affirms your opinion that he lost. Newsflash, it's not crappy just because you and many others disagree with it. Funny how in the US the movie Rocky is celebrated because of a guy who gets knocked down and keeps fighting until he wins. Ward doesn't that but somehow he is supposed to feel as if he received a gift?
Not every post has racist undertones, but many do. Let's not pretend.Comment
-
What makes scorecard better than the scorecards of the Ward Kovalev judges? Why is their judgment questionable and yours not? Why are they biased and you're not? What makes all the fighters, promoters, and boxing media that scored the fight for Ward wrong and you right?I never once thought robbery, it was a close fight, if I thought ward deserved the win I'd say it, I never said the judges were all of a sudden biased they were that already, and you can bet your a$$ that wasnt the first time they judged based on their emotions and how the live crowd reacted when their favourite jabs the underdogs gloves ,ward won coz of the judges decision? yes, questionable judging? Yes, 1600 fights between them or not lol do you think that means they ain't biased or can't have errors in their judgment? Well that was a ****** argument coz history has a million cases of bad judging, and getting on the judges d!ck$ to try prove a point is pretty lame
Decision could have gone either way. No need to come up with reasons why your opinion wasn't validated by the judges.Comment
-
Comment
-
Round 10 should answer your question, if you think that was Wards round you are just as biased as them, in a championship match with three unified belts at stake they scored it for ward?? Lol OK do what you will to discredit me but that was total bull$h!t, kov was the champ should've been his win or a draw. That's my opinion DawgWhat makes scorecard better than the scorecards of the Ward Kovalev judges? Why is their judgment questionable and yours not? Why are they biased and you're not? What makes all the fighters, promoters, and boxing media that scored the fight for Ward wrong and you right?
Decision could have gone either way. No need to come up with reasons why your opinion wasn't validated by the judges.Last edited by RememberTUA?; 11-29-2016, 03:47 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
I love how nutters are trying to cast Kovalev off as a clincher even though he's never done it before. But Ward, who always does it, is the one being defended by said nutters.
Ward would bend at the waist and go in for the clinch. In order for Kovalev to keep it a boxing match and not a grappling contest, he would get Ward in a headlock to stop things from getting ugly. He'd wait until the ref broke them up then get back to boxing. But Ward didn't want that so he turned it into a clinching game while the ref just looked on like a corrupt ref would.
That's what happened. Anything else you believe to have happened is just pure delusion on your part.Comment
-
Green K sent!
Comment