Erroll Spence vs. Timothy Bradley
Collapse
-
A lot of misconception in here is that Bradley easily loses to the bigger fighter which is wrong. Bradley benefits against bigger fighters that creates too many openings. Errol spence is the perfect candidate for that. He is too open for the left hook and relied to many times on his ability to over power the fighter with his punches. If you watch the Bradley fight against Lamont Peterson, see how bradley goes in on the inside with his bounce to be out of the reac hof Lamont Peterson and catches him with the right hand and the left hook all the time consistently because just Errol Spence, he opened too much when he tried to overpower Bradley.
Which is why Bradley U.DComment
-
Spence is a special talent. PAC and khan failed to stop algeiri. Spence became the first boxer to stop him.A lot of misconception in here is that Bradley easily loses to the bigger fighter which is wrong. Bradley benefits against bigger fighters that creates too many openings. Errol spence is the perfect candidate for that. He is too open for the left hook and relied to many times on his ability to over power the fighter with his punches. If you watch the Bradley fight against Lamont Peterson, see how bradley goes in on the inside with his bounce to be out of the reac hof Lamont Peterson and catches him with the right hand and the left hook all the time consistently because just Errol Spence, he opened too much when he tried to overpower Bradley.
Which is why Bradley U.DComment
-
Algerei was on his bike against Pac. Imagine if he stood there infront of Ruslan or Pac? Ruslan caved his head in, in the first round and decided to be on his bike the moment the bell rings on the second round. Khan wasn't a puncher.
Algerei was a sitting duck against Errol Spence because he changed his style completely against him, buy standing infront toe to toe, and that spells disaster if you have no power. It was obvious that he was going to stop Algerei.Comment
-
Notice how this guy talks like he knows something.A lot of misconception in here is that Bradley easily loses to the bigger fighter which is wrong. Bradley benefits against bigger fighters that creates too many openings. Errol spence is the perfect candidate for that. He is too open for the left hook and relied to many times on his ability to over power the fighter with his punches. If you watch the Bradley fight against Lamont Peterson, see how bradley goes in on the inside with his bounce to be out of the reac hof Lamont Peterson and catches him with the right hand and the left hook all the time consistently because just Errol Spence, he opened too much when he tried to overpower Bradley.
Which is why Bradley U.D
Bradley gets hit way more than Spence.
Tim gets brutalized.Comment
-
Algeri took everything Pac and Ruslan had to throw.Algerei was on his bike against Pac. Imagine if he stood there infront of Ruslan or Pac? Ruslan caved his head in, in the first round and decided to be on his bike the moment the bell rings on the second round. Khan wasn't a puncher.
Algerei was a sitting duck against Errol Spence because he changed his style completely against him, buy standing infront toe to toe, and that spells disaster if you have no power. It was obvious that he was going to stop Algerei.
Algeri tried to get on his bike vs Spence but it didn't help.Comment
-
You just can't leave Floyd's name out of that sour ballwasher you call a mouth.
Floyd has a better resume than all the fighters you like.
Comment
-
I think Spence is the best welterweight fighting today. He is a fast handed boxer and a vicious puncher with both hands to head and body. I don't think Bradley is as good as Spence in any way. I think Spence would beat any version of Bradley from the day Bradley turned pro up to now. He would probably stop him because Bradley usually stands his ground and doesn't retreat.Comment
Comment