that's about it for me. I don't know why people think it has to be a 120-85 fight for a robbery to happen.
If one guy did more and still lost he got robbed period.
However there is a difference between a robbery and a fix. For example the cards for the perez-hooker fight were obviously fixed/bribery. He was the "house fighter" and there's no WAY any judge is that blind.
I don't know if the kovalev fight was corruption or just sloppy lazy judging.
If one guy did more and still lost he got robbed period.
However there is a difference between a robbery and a fix. For example the cards for the perez-hooker fight were obviously fixed/bribery. He was the "house fighter" and there's no WAY any judge is that blind.
I don't know if the kovalev fight was corruption or just sloppy lazy judging.
Comment