Stephen a Smith calls robbery

[Dudley]

Stephen a smith is very pro black.

Steven A smith could be pro ice cream i could give a f.u.ck what that non says.

[Thraxox]

Stephen A Smith is the biggest Floyd-Ward nut hugger a commentator can be, and even him can't give Ward the nod of the decision. It just shows you how in denial NSB users here, that they still can't accept that they were beaten.

[Redd Foxx]

When you're using SAS to justify your position, that means you lost the argument.

[TripleGFightFan]

just a week ago stephen a. smith was a terrible boxing commentator who dksab...lmao...

[lizard_man]

dude could barely score the vargas pacquiao fight sitting ringside. what kind of scores do you think he'll come up with watching it through a tube.

[Mr. Objectivity]

I usually disagree with stephen A smith. he got this one doe.

[_Maxi]

I'm sorry. Love Ward as a fighter and person. Glad he won.....but he did not deserve this. Fair-is-Fair. Kovalev got robbed!#BadDecision.

— Stephen A Smith (@stephenasmith) 20 de noviembre de 2016

Ward gets unanimous 114-113 decision on all 3 scorecards. Love, love, love Ward. But he did not deserve this. Kovalev won a close fight.

— Stephen A Smith (@stephenasmith) 20 de noviembre de 2016

[Rip Chudd]

When you're using SAS to justify your position, that means you lost the argument.

This^^^^^^^^^^^

Next he'll bring up Skip Bayless

[_Maxi]

When you're using SAS to justify your position, that means you lost the argument.

Even many Ward fans say Kovalev won. The entire world saw Kovalev won. Don't let your nationality fool you.

[b00g13man]

Oh, so now SAS is credible?

Fuck outta here.

When you're using SAS to justify your position, that means you lost the argument.

Basically.